Updates from May, 2007 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Roberto Galoppini 12:10 pm on May 13, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Commercial Open Source is a Juggling act 

    Juggling, or more technically speaking toss juggling, is about throw objects into the air and catch them: easy to say, difficult to do. Gravity is very selective, despite anyone can learn to juggle, few people take time to discover what it really involves.

    Michael Moschen, one of greatest living jugglers, was interviewed by Anna Muoio, a Fast Company‘s journalist who wrote an inspirational article entitled “Life is a Juggling act“. I grabbed some idea from the original article – that I would recommend if interested in the subject – to talk about Commercial Open Source and Juggling.

    Juggling is mostly about breaking down patterns into simpler tasks. There are only two ingredients, tosses and catches. Even the most complex pattern can be broken apart into simpler steps. Once learn how simple are the individual atomic actions, you can recombine them, and eventually show your latest trick.

    Juggler Life is a Juggling act by f.vp

    In juggling there are three basic steps:

    First, make a good throw. Are you rolling the ball off your fingers — as you should — or are you using your palm? Do you throw the ball so it always falls away from you — as it should — or does it fly over your shoulder because you don’t want to let go of it?

    Throw the ball, open source your software. Whether you do it smoothly or not, you have to manage the fear to loose your business opportunities, your brand, or both. Throwing is the very first step, and you need to mind it carefully.

    Second, trust your throw. Look straight forward. Don’t focus on the ball. Realize that once you let go, you have no more control.

    Once you let it go choose if you want to keep coding on your own or not, assess the level of “promiscuity” that you want with your partners, ranging from “totalizing” to none, or “ecosystemic“. Whatever you choose, remember others can take advantage of it, and you might hardly find a way to prevent it. Gravity always wins.

    Third, put your hands under the ball. Let the ball fall into them. If you reach up for it, you cut the amount of time you have to adjust to catching it.

    After a good throw aim for a good catch, if you opted for a medium-long term strategy just wait for the business to come to you, think about Mozilla. You do know if it was a good or a bad throw.

    Juggling is not about Magic: you get just what you do.

    Technorati Tags: commercial open source, juggling, moschen

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 12:09 pm on May 12, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Links: 12-05-2007 

    Alan Shimel Should Stop Talking About Snort’s Licensing – Thomas Ptacek and Alan Shimel keep discussing about GPL compliance.

    Open source is bad for vendors – Yet another Dana Blankenhorn suggestion.

    Unisys shows acceptance of open source in biz application – It is still the Open Source Economy, System Integrators!

    OpenOffice.org in Education: A Roundup – a roundup into a set of references that could easily and quickly be investigated, by Ross Brunson, Linux Solutions Specialist at Novell.

    The Japanese government looks to go open source – The Japanese government said it wants to decrease its reliance on Microsoft as a server operating system platform.

    FSF still working to achieve Apache license compatibility for GPL 3 – The Free Software Foundation is working hard to establish compatibility between GPLv3 and Apache License.

    Technorati Tags: Apache, Commercial Open Source, FSF, GPLv3, Japan, OpenOffice, Snort

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 9:44 am on May 11, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Business Intelligence: Seth Grimes 

    Seth Grimes, a consultant specialized in large-analytic computing system, who in 2003 was engaged by Pentaho for market-positioning, few days ago stepped by Rome to present a course, entitled Open Source for the Enterprise.

    Seth a couple of weeks in advance wrote me an email to get in touch, and last sunday we meet to talk about the open source market, business intelligence and related stuff, as follows.

    Seth, how do you spend your day?

    Like you and many others I know, I have a fork in several pies. I spend about 40% of my time doing hands-on work relating to management, analysis, and dissemination of government and marketing statistics. Another 40% of my time I spend on IT strategy consulting, focusing on business intelligence and text-analytics technologies. The remaining 20% of my work is writing, presenting, and teaching — same topics, a variety of audiences — my Rome class on Open Source for the Enterprise, the Amsterdam Text Analytics Summit the week before, and so on.

    Are you deeply into Open Source?

    I’m not an open source specialist. I work at the applications layer, and I’ve found over the years that open source is often the best option measured by a combination of capabilities, ease of introduction and use, and cost. I’ve been using Python since the mid-’90s and Linux, MySQL, PHP almost as long. Over the years, I have become a fan of Apache, Mozilla, OpenOffice, and a slew of other Web and end-users tools.

    I suppose that my predisposition to open-source was helped along by my use of the Internet. Nothing unique there: the Net in earlier days was about connecting and sharing, a natural for those who are community minded. I think I first used Network News (Usenet) and sent my first international e-mail over Bitnet in 1984, and starting in the late ’80s, I was an Internet (and then Web) evangelist at a series of organizations where I was employed. But I actually trace my involvement in OSS — in commercial OSS much earlier.

    I first learned to program in high school in the mid-’70s. We wrote Basic code that was interpreted, not compiled, so the source code was exposed. Time-sharing users had access to program libraries: utilities, applications, games, etc. I spent many hours playing a Star Trek inspired space wars game — this was dial-in on a 110 baud/10 CPS teletype with an acoustic-coupler modem — and I coded a slew of enhancements and improvements. The commercial part: my friend Mitch and I went to Star Trek conventions in New York in ’75 and ’76, and the second year there I brought listings of my modified code and even a couple of copies punched out on paper tape, and I sold a couple to one of the exhibitors there. I think I got $10 each.

    Tell us something about Pentaho, and Open Source BI.

    Given my BI interest, I first surveyed open-source options back in 2002. I got a chance to use some of the software for real work starting in late 2004. I was hired to introduce BI at a Washington DC membership association, which had very limited in-house IT skills because all their applications — management of membership, bookstore and software sales, meetings, knowledge communities, continuing education — was hosted. In keeping with their modus operandi, the organization budgeted lots of money for consulting and nothing for software. So I set them up with MySQL, Mondrian OLAP, and JPivot for JSP interfaces, and I did my data work with Python. In retrospect, we should have spent more effort building a BI culture, figuring out how to incorporate analytics in everyday operations. The system funtioned well enough technically; acceptance obstacles had nothing to do with open/closed source software origins.

    That said, it OSBI of the era — and I think this is still largely true — was technology for Java developers. It took a lot of work to craft end-user applications. I wrote about this situation just a few months ago.
    OSBI is evolving. There are suite alternatives from a variety of companies with similar capabilities and but a variety of sponsor business models. I’ll probably write about some of them — Pentaho, JasperSoft, SpagoBI, OpenI, Palo Server — soon.

    May be at Gartner are too busy playing the Magic Quadrant game to notice that things are changing?

    Thank you Seth, and please keep us updated!

    Technorati Tags: Business Intelligence, Commercial Open Source, Seth, Pentaho

     
    • Truster 9:54 am on September 9, 2008 Permalink

      Thanks for the post and the interesting interview you had with Seth. It might change the way I look at the Internet: I did not know it started up that early. And it reminded me the time when most people did not have access to the internet; my first browsing a few years ago.

      But the purpose of this comment is not to talk about myself but to ask a question about OSBI and certain programs I have to choose. As written in the post, I have looked at applications you write about and others. So far I am pretty fond of two programs: Talend and Pentaho.

      It is difficult to make a choice when it comes to the performance, the compatibility and the components of the software. But a difference can be made by comparing the GUI which might be more user-friendly with Talend Open Studio: I especially like the tmap component in Talend Open Studio, a really good way to get a graphical and functional view of integration processes. The tool also has a good debugging system and an active community able to help you. Have some of you tried it out?

    • Roberto Galoppini 5:44 pm on September 9, 2008 Permalink

      I have just asked Seth, but unfortunately he is not a Talend Open Studio user.
      Googling around there are few free resources available comparing the two applications, at the end of the day choosing the “right” application is time consuming (what I call “the cost of free”).

      Keep us updated if you want, and happy hacking!

  • Roberto Galoppini 7:25 pm on May 10, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Conference: IDC OpenSolutions Summit canceled, lateral thoughts 

    IDC Italy, responsible for organizing the local Linux World OpenSolutions Summit, suffering from lack of sponsors decided to cancel the Italian event.

    As invited speaker I was supposed to give a speech in the plenary session, entitled “Open Source Business models: entrepreneurial islands and archipelagos“, about how open source firms cope with communities. Now that the conference has been canceled, the question raising up could be how open source firms cope with the market, and why they don’t invest money to sponsor events like this.

    Shift Game Over by si3illa

    Talking with Seth Grimes, invited speaker at the Reading the New York OpenSolutions Summit program (PDF), I learn that the American conference in February addressed vertical industries (Financial Services, Health Care, etc), and specific tracks (Linux on the Desktop, Virtualization, etc). The Italian event – originally designed as a two day event – was conceived as a “general purpose open source conference”, I guess to reach a broader audience.

    While many people registered to join the event, and many companies were interested in giving a speech, there were no enough sponsors to make it happen: the one-size-fit-all approach didn’t pay.

    The internet, along with its Group Forming Networks, has changed the way companies reach customers, and the way customers look for advices, for good. I see workshops, unconferences and barcamps – I missed the RedMonk’s one at CommunityOne – taking over the open source world.

    Magic (Open Source) quadrant game is pretty over by now, people have the power!

    Technorati Tags: OpenSolutions, Open Source Conference, Commercial Open Source, Grimes

     
    • gabriele 11:11 am on May 17, 2007 Permalink

      It’s a long story in Italian OS conferences … starting form Linux World. General purpose tracks, too much speeches, spreading FUD and, asking more money for sponsoring than abroad. First you must achieve reputation, than you can start to make money.

  • Roberto Galoppini 12:50 am on May 10, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Novell: the truth unveiled, software patents are part of the deal 

    Matthew Aslett brought some more light on the most discussed partnership in the open source arena, getting feedbacks once again from Justin Steinman, director of marketing for Linux and open platforms at Novell.

    The explanation given, see below, makes sense out of the Microsoft-Novell patent agreement, but it remains unclear why apparently it was not part of the agreement. (More …)

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 9:40 am on May 9, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Think Tank: “The future of Commercial Open Source” 

    The Olliance Group, an open source consulting firm providing open source market analysis, released an executive summary (PDF) of the “Open Source Think Tank“.
    The Olliance Group organized the second annual Think Tank on “The Future of Commercial Open Source” in California (Napa) on March, with participation from more than 100 open source leaders from around the world.

    Trends Trends by farfalina

    While invited, I couldn’t attend and I was eager to know what open source thought leaders think about the future, below some excerpts of the executive summary.

    Tony Perkins, founder and editor of Red Herring magazine and the founder and editor of AlwaysOn, helding his keynote speech mentioned that the cost of starting an Internet company reported that it plummeted by over 80% from 1996 to 2004, trend largely enabled by open source software and powerful, cheap hardware.

    The Think Tank guested two different CIO panel discussions, giving open source customers the chance to share their experiences with open source vendors. (More …)

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 6:52 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Google: Queplix CRM 

    Steven Yaskin, Queplix Chief Technology Officer, asked me to review his recent creation, an Open Source Customer Care web application named QueWeb Customer Care, made available also for download (requires registration) under an MPL + attribution license (QPL license).

    To boldly go by Cadigan

    Queplex was announced on the 23th of April, and apparently is the first commercial software built on Google Web Toolkit – an open source Java framework designed to deploy AJAX applications – chosen for the following reasons:

    Writing dynamic web applications today is a tedious and error-prone process; you spend 90% of your time working around subtle incompatibilities between web browsers and platforms, and JavaScript’s lack of modularity makes sharing, testing, and reusing AJAX components difficult and fragile. GWT lets you avoid many of these headaches while offering your users the same dynamic, standards-compliant experience. You write your front end in the Java programming language, and the GWT compiler converts your Java classes to browser-compliant JavaScript and HTML.

    I went through the live demo available on line – just in case I suggest you to read the brief guide for the demo, it might help – and it looks fancy, but I didn’t go much further than having a look at it.

    Queplix adopted the product specialists model, selling value added services for data conversions and it looks like if it is going to start a partnership program based on a new upcoming product:

    QueWeb Professional (scheduled for Q3 2007), for IT consulting companies and Value Added Resellers (VARs) serving customers with verticalized or specialized solutions. Features a QueWeb OS download along with a set of proprietary development tools, including: QueDesigner to more easily customize, configure, integrate and build additional functionality; and QueCrawler to “crawl” through company legacy metadata and extract business objects for the replication of existing business processes and GUIs.

    Queplix involving VARs might start its own marketplace, and opening to a Split OSS/Commercial products business model, who knows.

    About Commercial Open Source, I disagree with this pretty bold statement:

    Queplix is the only enterprise-level commercial open-source vendor

    As far as I can see they still have to work on creating and leveraging their own community – as others like MySql and at some extent Alfresco are trying to do now – but… is Queplix willing to abandon the corporate production model?

    Technorati Tags: Queplix, commercial open source, google web toolkit

     
    • Steven 11:49 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink

      Roberto, thanks. As always, this was a very insightful and informative post with good comments. Let me try to explain the comment “Queplix is the only enterprise-level commercial open-source vendor” if I may. We were not trying to offend anybody, just merely describing that we are coming from the other side of Open Source vendors’ spectrum: Queplix started as an open source solution for enterprise in 2003. As such, we did not have the community and huge following as other open source companies have (as you rightfully sited Alfresco and Sugar); but instead we focused on adoption of our product within enterprise. It was not until we had a dozen of Fortune 500 companies with global deployments and stable revenues that we decided to create a community around our product. As you noted, this community is just starting up, while our product development is being actively fueled by our enterprise customers. That is what prompted our marketing people to say that we are very proud of being first widely adopted enterprise solution in customer care. Let me know what you think.

    • Roberto Galoppini 10:23 am on May 8, 2007 Permalink

      Steven, thanks to join the conversation.

      I believe you at Queplix are totally right being proud of enterprises’ adoption of your product, and I also believe that your VAS proposition basically based on conversions pays.

      Reading others’ opinions, today I created an account to access properly the download area, reporting:

      Choose between two Windows Installer programs: Full Installer with a complete stack of software required for QueWeb Open Source edition or the Light Installer if you already have installed JBoss and MySQL. Software included in the Full-stack Installer: QueWeb Customer Care OSS edition, MySQL©, JBoss© and Java© binaries.

      For other deployment options consider upgrading to the Enterprise edition with support for BEA©, Websphere©, JBoss and Orion© as well as running on the latest Oracle©, MS SQL Server©, DB2© and Sybase© versions.

      Could you possibly make clearer the difference between the Open Source Edition and the Enterprise one? It might greatly help users and potential customers, and I could also update my business model considerations.

      About building communities I believe it is much easier in the infrastructural arena, but both marketplace and franchising approaches can greatly help.

      I hope to hear back from you.

    • Steven 4:45 pm on May 9, 2007 Permalink

      We believe we came up with the actually different approach to the open source model. This approach was more of a natural progression for Queplix, since we did not create it, but rather our customers demanded it. Queplix solves a specific problem – we eliminate specific pain points that exist today in our industry niche, which is Customer Care. Queplix founders (including myself) spent many years working as consultants for the major companies working in CRM and Service, implementing proprietary software such as the siebels and vantives of this world. Being consultants, we were always between the hammer and the hard place, since vendors produced bulky and rigid products while customers demanded more custom things. We were walking the thin line between losing the vendor’s support and failing the implementation. Without disclosing any names, I can tell you that I worked for 3 out of 5 BIG consulting companies for over 12 years, with the same result – while we had more than half of the projects go live, corners were cut, support was limited and future upgrades required millions in additional consulting fees. That was all too familiar CRM world dominated by big and proprietary technology vendors.

      In the recent years however, the consolidation among the big CRM vendors was predominant and following the IT sector collapse in early 2000, a lot of smaller and successful CRM vendors were disappearing for various reasons (i.e. Quintus, Vantive). This left hundreds of medium and large corporations left with the proprietary, closed solution, which was heavily customized, deeply entrenched within the company, and something on which the company spent millions trying to make it satisfy at least 80% of their requirements and no vendor. What are the customer’s choices? Continue running legacy solution until it crashes and burns, while slowing down entire infrastructure and creating a security threat by not being updated by the vendor anymore and still not satisfying most of the existing and new requirements. Second choice – dump everything they have built, write off millions spent on existing solution and buy a new solution, not unlike the previous one; go through adoption of new rules, data migration, user training, deployment, etc. etc. In other words forgo entire investment in previous system and make a new investment in the same type of a product, only more expensive. Some tough choices.

      Most of the companies running legacy CRM solutions are still running them, as they are unaware of the third choice. Queplix was created by CRM consulting veterans with one simple idea: allow companies to maintain their investment into legacy systems, while not requiring them to migrate to yet another closed product; in fact, we almost eliminate the migration all together. The solution is QueWeb on open source platform, coupled with the powerful business transformation engine that identifies all business objects in the legacy system and extracts them to the open source platform. QueWeb is distributed today through two channels: one for small to medium companies that have no CRM in place, as long as they buy into open source paradigm they can use and customize QueWeb any way they want. The out of the box features are abundant for SMB. The second channel is large enterprises with existing legacy systems: we convert these systems into QueWeb using our QCrawler and QDesigner tools. The conversion is almost entirely automated and it eliminates data migration, redoing all customizations and even mimics the screens. We convert all entities, business objects, custom developed VBA scripts, stored procedures, etc. everything that belongs to the customer, without taking a line of code from the legacy system itself (which is impossible anyways since it is closed). At the end, we save the investment made into legacy CRM and eliminate the possibility for the customer to be in the same bad position ever again. We have done over 12 such large migrations for large enterprises, migrating various enterprises from Siebel, Vantive, Avaya, Quintus and others to QueWeb in a matter of weeks. Nobody is safe anymore in the legacy world . We are finalizing the conversion drivers now for Peoplesoft and starting to look at Remedy and other similar proprietary vendors that still exist today.

      Now, the difference between our enterprise and open source editions is simply in number of pluggable functional modules, enterprise edition more modules that we believe apply to larger companies (archiving, survey, customer portal, dealer portal, change request, HR, etc.) Both solutions are identical in terms of underlying technology – which is J2EE and Google open source engine (GWT). We offer legacy conversion for enterprises with different levels of SLAs and support (we or our partners always offer to support 100% of all QueWeb systems).

      Third version, QueWeb Professional, which we are planning to release in Q3 of this year, will be targeted to our VARs and integrators. It will add the above mentioned QCrawler and QDesigner integrated development and conversion tools. These tools will NOT be open sourced however and this is how we plan to continue our growth. Our believe is that software we develop and promote should be open source, but we will charge developers and analysts for the usage of our design and conversion tools, which they can use to convert legacy CRM and, in the future, any proprietary software to our open source model, generate a business application and then resale it.

      Would love to know your opinion on this, as this is something of a totally new approach to open source. To make it easier to analyze, we proved this approach by converting a dozen Fortune 500 companies in Europe and US in the last 2 years from various legacy CRM systems to QueWeb, all with global deployments in thousands of users. One more comment: Queplix had been mostly under the radar of media and current hype around the open source for few reasons: we are still a small company and we never raised VC funds, focusing on the core development. We can successfully sell to large companies since we resolve their paint point; this does not require large marketing expenses on one side, and allowing us to distribute QueWeb under the open source license to smaller companies on the other side.

    • Roberto Galoppini 8:57 pm on May 11, 2007 Permalink

      Hi Steven, thank you very much for your long comment, here some few spare questions. Quoting you:

      Now, the difference between our enterprise and open source editions is simply in number of pluggable functional modules, enterprise edition more modules that we believe apply to larger companies (archiving, survey, customer portal, dealer portal, change request, HR, etc.) Both solutions are identical in terms of underlying technology – which is J2EE and Google open source engine (GWT). We offer legacy conversion for enterprises with different levels of SLAs and support (we or our partners always offer to support 100% of all QueWeb systems

      What about making available a product comparison chart?

      Third version, QueWeb Professional, which we are planning to release in Q3 of this year, will be targeted to our VARs and integrators. It will add the above mentioned QCrawler and QDesigner integrated development and conversion tools. These tools will NOT be open sourced however and this is how we plan to continue our growth. Our believe is that software we develop and promote should be open source, but we will charge developers and analysts for the usage of our design and conversion tools, which they can use to convert legacy CRM and, in the future, any proprietary software to our open source model, generate a business application and then resale it.

      I totally follow your line of reasoning here, it makes perfect sense to you keeping proprietary tools enabling the delivery of added value services. Doing that you are not upselling your community, and you are (honestly) providing causes for effects. Tools could greatly help your partners to manage customers’ expectations. Your channel can’t be deeply involved with your (upcoming) community, channels love marketing shortcuts.

    • Joe Austin 12:24 am on February 11, 2011 Permalink

      Queplix Virtual Migration Manager Reduces Data Migration Time from Months to Days – Cuts Costs by up to 75 Percent – http://bit.ly/goaN2Y

    • Roberto Galoppini 9:51 am on February 11, 2011 Permalink

      Readers would better check out a later blog post about Queplix, explaining why they didn’t go open source eventually.

  • Roberto Galoppini 5:24 pm on May 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Website: SWiK by SourceLabs 

    Cybernote weekend website article is dedicated to SWiK, a community-driven website created by SourceLabs aimed at allowing people to share all kind of information about open source projects.

    SwiK is a kind of Newsvine about software development and open source projects, aimed at helping people to organize the world of open source. SwiK it is an open source wiki and it uses Ajax, JavaScript and Textile, making editing easy and straightforward, try it out by yourself.

    In Ashley‘s words:

    It’s like Wikipedia, Del.icio.us, and Digg all mixed into one, but it’s just for anything related with Open Source projects. The great thing about SWiK is that it showcases all of the hard work that people have put into their Open Source projects. If you’re unfamiliar with Open Source projects and you’d like to find and discover new ones, this is the perfect place to start.

    Anyone can contribute, writing anything related to open source, in any language, where English is the default one.

    Looking for some hystorical background I found a long post by Alex Bosworth about SWiK first “birthday”, a reading that I recommend to whom interested in social software.

    Alex says also that Spikesource SourceLabs is using SWiK internally:

    I don’t think there’s any reason it can’t be used for various purposes beyond driving swik.net, and in fact for the past 6 months internally at SourceLabs we’ve repurposed SWiK-Source to run as our internal wiki to help organize our internal projects. People write weekly status reports in the blog pages, describe design policies in wiki pages, and use tags to avoid a disorganized wiki.

    I am willing to give it a try, I’ll keep you posted about it.

    Technorati Tags: Open Source, SWiK, SourceLabs, social software

     
    • Vin 5:38 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink

      Did you mean ‘SourceLabs’ when you said “Spikesource is using SWiK internally” ? Because the title and content do not match.

    • Roberto Galoppini 5:54 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink

      Vin thank you, I promptly corrected my mistake!

  • Roberto Galoppini 7:30 pm on May 5, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Hackers: about retaining them, the Novell case 

    In dicember Jeremy Allison of Samba fame resigned from Novell in protest over the Microsoft-Novell patent agreement, about a month ago Jeremy Irons, one of the lead developers of the Samba Team, also left Novell giving advices to young programmers, and now it is Robert Love turn to leave, as reported by Dave Rosenberg.

    Managing human resources by Mark & The Zebra

    Robert Love in his blog wrote a post eloquently entitled “epilogue“.

    An operose decision, I resigned as Chief Architect of our Linux Desktop endeavor, effective today.

    In the house that Ximian built, we dreamt and saw to fruition the world’s finest Linux desktop, Linux’s first desktop commercial success. Seated at the table aside some of the industry’s sharpest hackers, we challenged ourselves not with the goal of building another Linux desktop, but with the aim of engineering a more perfect desktop—Linux or otherwise. Unsatisfied with simply cheaper, we went for broke: better and faster, too. SLED’s éclat is ours.

    Leaving is never easy. But here and now the timing is right and so, after three and a half years, here’s to what’s next.

    It is great time for Novell, and not only Novell, to understand that free software’s gurus and open source hackers need love too. The employer knowing exactly what is annoying people can respond and retain people longer. Is Novell listening hard enough?

    Open Source firms selling software made from scratch within their organizations – what I call Corporate Production Model – don’t need to pay too much attention to retain their employees, no more than any other software company.

    On the contrary firms basing their business on commons, need to feed patiently and persistently the hackers they hired. Weak intellectual property assets need a lot of care, appropriating returns is already difficult without extra handicaps.
    Whether Microsoft is really hiring Open Source Evangelists or not, Commercial Open Source firms have to pay a lot of attention, hackers are precious to them.

    Technorati Tags: Commercial Open Source, hackers, novell, hiring

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 6:00 pm on May 3, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    European Open Source Projects: transparency pays 

    European Community is known to finance many projects regarding Open Source Software, and it would be interesting to know more about such public spending.

    Few days ago Alberto Sillitti, from the university of Bozen, one of the Qualipso members, asked me to join a Qualipso’s workshop that will be held in Limerick, within the Third International Conference on Open Source Systems. He kindly asked me to join the meeting to bring over my thinking, and to get myself prepared I went through their website and other projects’ websites.

    I enjoyed the FLOSSMetrics approach, fully disclosing their description of work (PDF), stripped only from some confidential information. Reading their document (53 pages long) I found all possible details about the project, including the project management and exploitation/dissemination plan and the detailed Workplan.

    transparency

    Kudos to FLOSSMetrics to choose transparency, but it is worth to notice that many other projects did the same, checkout yourself searching IST Projects “Description of work”.

    My first suggestion to Qualipso: made public your description of work, transparency pays.

    Technorati Tags: IST, Qualipso, FLOSSMetrics, Open Source

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel