Updates from September, 2008 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Roberto Galoppini 9:38 am on September 3, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Repository: Public Launch of the European Open Source Repository 

    The launch of the Open Source Observatory and Repository for European Public Administrations will be held in Màlaga on the 20th of October during the Open Source World Conference, one of the most important FLOSS event in Europe.

    The draft agenda, available at the IDABC website, starts at 9.15 with a an hour workshop on FLOSS procurement, a very hot topic at least by Italian public administrations. Marco Battistoni, Unisys OSOR Technical Manager, will later introduce the audience to the new European repository, talking about the platform and its services.

    In the afternoon a round table moderated by Karel DeVriendt, IDABC Head of Unit, will give highlights on a selection of European open source projects. Among them Wollmux and the Qualipso project.

    Technorati Tags: OSOR, Open Source Repository, IDABC, MarcoBattistoni, KarelDeVriendt

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 7:53 pm on August 13, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source at Wall Street: Marketcetera enables hedge funds and trading firms to access ACTIV’s data feeds 

    Marketcetera, an open source firm developing a platform for automated trading, after having secured $4 million in its first round of funding, has now partnered ACTIV Financial, a provider of low-latency market data.

    The availability of ACTIV’s real-time equity data on the Marketcetera platform represents increasing momentum in open source adoption by Wall Street’s automated trading institutions.

    Making senseMaking sense by Eccleston George Public Artists

    Graham Miller and Toli Kuznets, the two founders of Marketcetera, told me a lot about their interesting business experience few months ago, and I asked Graham to share some background about this joint solution.

    The addition of Activ’s real-time equity data to Marketcetera’s open source platform provides a new array of capabilities and features for tactical trading systems, while preserving all the flexibility and breadth of ACTIV’s data feeds. Unlike a proprietary trading application, the Marketcetera platform provides a wealth of uses for the market data out-of-the-box, in addition to a platform for building custom pricing logic and visualizations. This means that trading strategies can be brought to market much more quickly and with less development time than with other solutions.

    It will be interesting to see if being open will help Marketcetera to further expand its customer base, allowing proprietary and secret trading algorithms is proving to be key to their success.

    Technorati Tags: marketcetera, trading platform, commercial open source, activ, activ financial

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 4:38 pm on August 7, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Jolt Awards Nominations 2008: Nominations are about to open 

    Dr. Dobb’s Journal in September will throw its 19th Annual Jolt Product Excellence Awards, aimed at recognizing innovative products, books and web sites that have “jolted” the software development industry in 2008.

    Nominations for the 19th Annual Jolt Product Excellence Awards are going to be open before the end of September. The deadline for nominations will be November 12, 2008.

    JoltThe more participants we have the more fun the award will be by jc_iverson’s

    There are 16 categories, and last year it has been a tough job fully participate and judge the products in all my chosen categories, maybe I should concentrate only on a few of them this year.
    Technorati Tags: ,

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 9:39 pm on August 6, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Webinar: Open Source Reporting Tools, by OpenLogic 

    OpenLogic just announced a webinar on comparison of open source reporting tools.

    Open source reporting tools like Jasper, Pentaho, and BIRT have become increasingly popular with enterprises seeking to gain flexibility in reporting while reducing expenses, but each application has its own strengths and weaknesses. This webinar will provide a comparison across more than 15 key attributes for the most popular open source software reporting tools.

    Register now.

     
  • Raphael Bauduin 8:53 am on July 30, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Conference: Profoss Open Source ERP events 

    ERP software is at the core of a business’ operations, from stock management to accounting, from efficiency measurement to activity planning.

    Few other applications could be more crucial to a company’s continued operations. So it’s not a surprise that ERP is the subject of a Profoss event. It fits perfectly Profoss‘ goal to inform professional ICT people of the possibility to use Free and Open Source Software in the most critical operations of a company.

    ERPERP by xcode

    And Free and Open Source Software clearly has demonstrated its ability to stand in critical environments: from space exploration to SME.

    This central position of ERP software often makes it a challenge to deploy it: it is a complex project that needs the commitment of multiple teams in a company. Proprietary ERP solutions are available but the software itself often makes it difficult to deploy (some even say it’s done on purpose). And these deployment costs come on top of the hefty license costs. Moreover, lots of companies don’t need the whole range of features brought by these ERP solutions, and would be served well by choosing simpler solution better fitting their needs.

    Luckily, there are viable Free and Open Source solutions available. The hardest part might be to identify the best solution. And that’s where Profoss wants to help you. We’ll bring specialist of the field to share their experience and help you decide what’s the best solution for you. We’ll even have a talk titled ‘How to choose my Open Source ERP system’!

    As this subject is very broad, the event will be split in two sessions: one on 18 November focusing on the ERP applications themselves, and on session on 2 December focusing on peripheral applications and integrating ERP systems in your current infrastructure.

    No speaker has been officially announced, but you may expect to have leading figures from at least OpenERP, Adempiere, OpenBravo and Compiere.To stay up to date with the advancement of the event organisation, you can subscribe to the Profoss Newsletter or the Profoss Feed.

    This event will take place in Brussels, but we’re looking to possibly organise it in other locations throughout Europe. If you want to see such a Profoss event take place near you, be sure to contact us!

    About Profoss.
    Profoss is in the process of being established as an Belgian non-profit association, with the goal to provide independent and objective information on the use of Free and Open Source technologies in professional environments.

    Technorati Tags: Open Source ERP, Enterprise Resource Planning, Profoss, Open Source Conference, Adempiere, Compiere OpenBravo, OpenERP, open source applications

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 7:37 pm on July 2, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Community Awards: Selected Finalists Announced 

    Sourceforge 2008 community choice awards‘ nomination phase is closed, the finalists list is on line and it is time to vote.

    I am partialI Am Also Partial To A Sip Of Wine Sometimes… by *lemonade*

    This year’s pool is a mixture of old favorites and new names, and I am happy that OpenOffice.org is in the “Most Likely to Change the World” category, and invite you to vote for our beloved project!

    Yes, I am partial to my favorite open source productive suite!

    Technorati Tags: SourceForge, Open Source Community, Community Awards, OpenOffice.org, openoffice

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 4:48 pm on July 1, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Survey: About OpenLogic Census 

    Six months ago OpenLogic announced the Open Source Census, an initiative to quantify the global use of open source in enterprises. On the 16th of April OpenLogic eventually launched the collaborative project to collect and share quantitative data on the use of open source software, and recently announced the first results.
    Complete Lego CensusComplete Lego Census by Cavalier92

     

    • Ubuntu is the top Linux distribution on machines scanned to date – Various versions of Ubuntu accounted for almost 50% of all Linux distributions installed on participating machines. Debian accounted for 14%; SUSE Linux accounted for 12% of install base; Fedora Core 7%.
    • International interest in Census – 66% of machines scanned in the first two months were outside the U.S. U.S. participants represented about one third of participants. Active global participation in the Census came from areas such as Europe, Canada and Australia.
    • Top open source packages – The top 5 installed open source packages were in order were, Firefox, Xerces, Zlib, Xalan and Prototype.

    I asked my twitter and blog buddy Stormy Peters , Director of Community and Partner Programs at OpenLogic, some feedback about the Census initiative. OpenLogic is an open source firm providing services to help customers to manage open source governance, taking advantage of the frequent lack of open source corporate actors. Apparently launching this survey OpenLogic is doing Forrester, Gartner or IDC job (the last is one of the sponsor of the initiative).

    Why OpenLogic decided to launch an opt-in survey?

     

    As OpenLogic worked with large enterprises, we realized that companies did not know how much open source software they were using. To help address this problem, we developed an open source tool, OSS Discovery, to allow companies to inventory the open source on their systems. As we started working with customers to conduct these inventories, we felt that it would be useful to aggregate this data in an anonymous way. From this experience, The Open Source Census was born. Most research firms use traditional surveys (of software vendors or of end users). Unfortunately, these methods are inadequate for open source since it is downloaded freely and companies do not always know how much open source they are using. IDC sponsored The Open Source Census to supplement the data that they get from other research methods.

    Traditional surveys, basically done by phone calls to software vendors, simply don’t work: OSS procurement is done by clicking on a download button, most of the times. OpenLogic conducting such a survey sponsored by IDC is definitely a sign of the time.

     

     

    What can you tell about the OS census so far?

    We are happy with the initial response to The Open Source Census with almost 1500 systems scanned as of Jun 30. To date, most of the participants in the Census are individuals scanning and submitting data for one or two systems. This is expected since these participants primarily came from press when we launched The Open Source Census. We are now working to actively recruit large enterprises to scan a sampling of machines. We expect that many of these enterprises will scan hundreds or even thousands of machines. The sponsors of The Open Source Census are currently recruiting enterprises and we expect these activities to pay off in the months ahead as enterprises submit large blocks of scans to the Census.

    Enterprises scans will tell us a lot of interesting things, I am not sure Firefox or Xerces will still be in the top ten, though.

    Any comment about the reaction to news of Microsoft’s Support of Open Source Census?

     

    From the beginning, we knew that we wanted The Open Source Census to be a collaborative effort – not just specific to OpenLogic. We felt that collaboration was critical to making The Open Source Census successful. Prior to launching The Open Source Census, we began the process of reaching out to a wide variety of participants in the open source community and ecosystem. The list included large platform vendors, commercial open source vendors, open source communities and organizations, law firms and analysts. Because this is an open project, we did not limit or exclude anyone from sponsoring or participating – as long as they agreed with the goals and process for The Open Source Census. We welcome all sponsors who might want to participate and help make The Open Source Census successful.

    Beyond Stormy’s diplomatic answer all the fuss around Microsoft’s sponsorship is spreading the word about the open source census, and Matt Asay, Savio Rodrigues and Sean Michael Kerner posts are of help in this respect.

    Side effect or not?

    About The Open Source Census:
    The Open Source Census is a global, collaborative project to collect and share quantitative data on the use of open source software in enterprise. Founded by OpenLogic, the Open Source Census has a number of sponsors including OpenLogic and IDC. The Open Source Census initiative has open source tools designed to scan individual enterprise computers for all installed open source software. The results of these scans can then be contributed anonymously to the Open Source Census, where the aggregate data is published.

    Technorati Tags: commercial open source, openlogic, OpenLogic Census, IDC, Gartner, Forrester, StormyPeters

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 11:17 am on June 22, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: Lazio e-Citizen, secretly open source compatible 

    epractice.eu, the portal created by the European Commission offers a service for the professional community of eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth practitioners, reported about Lazio e-Citizen, a digital inclusion project.

    The programme responded to European directives on the Lisbon Strategy and its objectives were to increase the residents’ awareness of the importance of digital literacy, the benefits that e-skills bring to their personal and professional lives, and to fight against social exclusion. The project developed a strategy to bridge the digital divide based on specific criteria: gender, age and skill levels.

    SecretDon’t be a secret keeper by *Drangongly*

    I asked Alessandra Devitofrancesco (ECDL foundation), author of the Lazio e-Citizen case reported on epractice to tell me more, and she kindly put me in touch with the AICA (ECDL member) responsible of the initiative, Pierpaolo Maggi.

    He explained me that the project has been developed using the open source course management system Moodle, and that the portal is accessible also through Firefox and Netscape. On the contrary the article on epractice and also e-citizen FAQ report (bold emphasis is mine):

    The schools, universities and Permanent Territorial Centres which were involved in the Lazio e-Citizen project were chosen according to different technological requirements:

    • Availability of one or more rooms with at least 12+5 desks and Internet access (ADSL or wireless)
    • LAN network among all desks and shared printer
    • PC Pentium 4 (or superior) or equivalent (i.e. AMD)
    • Windows 2000 or later versions
    • Browser: Internet Explorer 6.0 or superior
    • Accessories: audio set and headphones: CD ROM reader, minimum video resolution SVGA 800×600

It is time for outing, I publicly invite project’s promoters to disclose the specific technology choice (moodle), how it has been used and, last but not the least, telling people that the portal is accessible to open source.

eAccessibility and eInclusion are definitely also about allowing open source users to access information.

Technorati Tags: eAccessibility, eInclusion, digital literacy, digital divide, moodle, lazio e-citizen, course management system, epractice, Lazio

 
  • Roberto Galoppini 6:42 am on June 17, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Monitoring: RRDTool 1.3 available, a chat with Tobias Oetiker 

    RRDTool, the round-robin database tool, announced the release of RRDtool 1.3. The new release includes additional capabilities and functionalities, and it has been rewritten to make it more modular.

    Tobias Oetiker, the author of many famous open source tools like RRDTool, MRTG and SmokePing holding a seat on GroundWork Open Source’s Project Lead Council, approaches software development from an hacker perspective: to scratch a personal itch.

    Tobias Oetiker
    Tobias Oetiker (on the right) by QFamily

    Since I had issues to solve and did not find existing software to do it. Then because I use OSS almost exclusively in my work, I found it only fair to share the results of my work too. After all OSS only works when several parties throw their goods into the basket.

    How all this started?

    I wrote MRTG and SmokePing because I needed the functionality. So essentially I wrote them for myself. And since I like to see people enjoying using my tools, I put them out there. In the case of rrdtool, I did not need it directly, but based on the experience from writing MRTG I had a pretty clear vision as to what tool is missing from the system managers toolbox.

    So the motivation for writing rrdtool was primarily drawn from the positive feedback I got from mrtg users. As it turned out, I had actually hit a nerve with all three of my tools since they all got pretty good use across the net.

    For most of the time while developing the tools I have been working for ETH Zurich and did the tool work mostly in my spare time. Since I had a fixed income from the University I did not explore commercial opportunities.

    Originally economic incentives weren’t the cause behind such code developments.
    What about the economic incentives, today?

    I found that publishing software as OSS has the nice effect of triggering more feedback than in a closed environment and also draws contributions every now and then which is a very nice plus the economic value is in me being known quite well for my work which makes it very easy getting contracts, because people assume I know stuff, which is not entirely a wrong assumption <smile>.

    There are also direct benefits, in the sense that some companies contract me to develop additional features for the OSS packages. I always draw up the contracts such that I can include the results back into the mainline. Most of smokePing extensions have been created in this way.

    Tobias was the typical hacker described by researches interested in understanding motivations (intrisic motivations). Later Tobias was also also motivated by financial rewards (extrinsic motivations), coming from selling consulting services on his products, and he eventually ended open his own company.

    Which are your source of revenues, besides consulting?

    Well I am trying this with the sponsorship approach, the idea is that companies that profit from the products become a sponsor who just gives money to encourage the future development of the product. I use this money to pay for maintaining the products and developing some additions which are not covered by some other contract, just because I think they are necessary a further source of income is google ads which works quite well due to the high traffic on the website.

    Which are the advantages for your customers? And for you?

    The big advantage of this approach is that the customers normally have a clear vision of which problem they want to solve, and since I know the tool well I can integrate an optimal solution which will continue to evolve even after the contract ends, since the extension is now part of the product.

    This leads to a forth motivation to do it all. Being the author of these well known tools gives me a certain standing in the industry, which comes in handy when bidding for contracts, since customer assume (rightly) that I know stuff and I am able to finish projects.

    Our biggest contract last year had nothing to do with any of the tools but the customer asked us only because he had seen my name mentioned in connection with monitoring.

    Tobias creates tools in a way that users can get along without needing any extra support contract. The software is enriched as part of their service offerings, and as time goes by they enhance their toolbox. They do not sell tools, but the stuff they make the tools for.

    Oetiker + Partner AG is a pure IT service company, for some probably the highest form of open source firm.

    Happy hacking Tobias!

    About RRDtool
    RRDtool is a freely (as in freedom and in beer) available software tool for the collection and graphical display of time series data and is deployed to monitor computer networks and network traffic. Installed at hundred thousands of sites world wide, RRDtool monitors everything from small local networks to large IT infrastructures of internationally operating telecom providers. RRDtool is included in the family of Open Source tools developed by Tobias Oetiker, which also includes MRTG, and SmokePing, which is used for the measurement and display of line quality parameters in Internet connections. For more information about MRTG, RRDtool and SmokePing visit: http://oss.oetiker.ch

    Technorati Tags: TobiasOetiker, Open Source Monitoring, Network Management, GroundWork, RRDTools, MRTG, smokeping, motivations

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 4:04 pm on June 6, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Developers: Fabio Marzocca 

    Fabio Marzocca

    Fabio Marzocca of the Baobab fame, is an Italian Ubuntu-developer with an amazing background, ranging from being a technical writer by an historic Italian magazine named Mc Microcomputer to developing a program for music composing, known as the Muzical Wizard.

    Few days Fabio posted few comments on my blog, and we happened to know each other, below the interview that followed.

    How did you start getting working with GNU/Linux?

    It was 6 or 7 years ago when I became very sad looking at my old portable pc that was slowly dying of a broken heart under the constant resource-demanding policy of a proprietary operating system. I didn’t want to throw it away so I gave it a chance with a linux kernel. From that point on, my experimenting and curious approach towards things of life made the rest. Those were the years of the geek, but then I realized that GNU/Linux was a sort of safe and extremely comfortable house to live in. You are surrounded by a crowd of very active fellows who are there to support you, to accept your criticism, to implement your suggestions and to share their and your work.

    How did you manage to bring Baobab accepted into GNOME?

    Baobab was first introduced in Debian repositories as a deb package. In 2005 I was contacted by Benoit Dejean (a gnome developer – libgtop) and he asked Olaf Vitters to host baobab source tree on gnome cvs. I then started using gnome tools, polishing the code to fit gnome standards, and so on, releasing regular versions. Later that year I met Paolo Borelli, a great gnome-developer who joined Baobab project giving it a strong code enhancement. Paolo was (and actually is) a real milestone for the project. At the beginning of 2006 Emmanuele Bassi, gnome-utils project maintainer, asked me to merge Baobab into gnome-utils as Disk Usage Analyzer, so we started the gnome adventure. Then Alejandro Castro and his Spanish team of Igalia joined the project, adding the beautiful ringschart view to Baobab. I have found Gnome community a great ecosystem for a software project: very professional, skilled and committed people, always available to suggest, integrate and cooperate for the common target.

    What about Ubuntu?

    In 2005, together with other 2 fellows, I founded ubuntu-it the italian support Community to Ubuntu. We started setting up the basic tools to provide assistance and support: a web portal, a forum, a mailing list and an IRC channel. Since then, the community has grown very rapidly and now the current organization helds up more than 10 separate working groups. I recently gave an interview to Italian national TV explaining the significance of the recent Long Term Support release, Ubuntu 8.04.

    Congratulations to have been able to bring Ubuntu on Italian TV! I am hoping that a “pubblicità progresso” open source awaraness campaign could eventually help us to regularly spread the word about open source.

    What are the advantages of the community when it comes to product development?

    The strong and large barrier between you (the user) and the authors of a software project are knocked down. Whenever you may need, you know that you can send an email or join a chat channel to ask which will be the future plans of a product and its new features. You will never do that without a strong ecosystem such as an open source community. The communication channels with the users are a strategic resource for the community: each comment is deeply evaluated and frequently it becomes a code improvement. We should not either underestimate the “social” effects that collaboration produces on its participants: the more they cooperate, the more they feel themselves motivated to hit a common target.
    Another main advantage fo the community on product development is quality control: it often happens that several communities join their efforts together when the release time for an application is getting closer, to check the code and push on debugging. New features release happens only when the community has taken a common decision.

    Fabio talking about the (positive) social effect associated with a tight communication channel between users-developers and authors raises an interesting point, adding something to what Simo Sorce reported about his experience with Samba.

    Happy hacking Fabio!

    Technorati Tags: open source developers, ubuntu, gnome, baobab

     
  • c
    Compose new post
    j
    Next post/Next comment
    k
    Previous post/Previous comment
    r
    Reply
    e
    Edit
    o
    Show/Hide comments
    t
    Go to top
    l
    Go to login
    h
    Show/Hide help
    shift + esc
    Cancel