Updates from July, 2008 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Roberto Galoppini 9:59 am on July 10, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Standards: European Interoperability Framework and IPR 

    On the 25th of June IDABC organized an Information Day on the novelties of the new version of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) and now the dispute is open: BSA representatives call for “own goal”, while open source evangelists explain why standards on a RAND basis are discriminatory towards open source software.

    Dispute about Europe-wide definition of open standards

    A dispute has been sparked in Brussels about the definition of open standards to promote the interoperability between eGovernment services. According to drafts for a revision of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) which were recently presented by the European Commission’s Directorate General for Informatics, the specifications of open standards have to be made available either free of charge, or for a specified nominal fee. If a standard, or parts of it, are protected by patents, the revision stipulates that these parts have to be “made irrevocably available on a royalty-free basis” for third party use. This has caused protests by IT business associations like the Business Software Alliance (BSA), which counts Microsoft and Intel among its members. [..]

    Jan Wildeboer is an open source evangelist at Red Hat in Europe who supports the plans for the revised EIF version. He explained, in an interview with heise online, “Particularly the stipulation that presumed intellectual property has to be made available without the payment of license fees in open standards complies with a fundamental requirement for open source developers and providers of open source solutions.” He said open standards are generally a “vital component of modern IT infrastructures”, and was surprised that the BSA renewed its call for license fees to be paid for HTTP and DHCP. Wildeboer said this argument has already proved redundant in the debate about software patents.

    Read the full article.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 9:26 am on July 9, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Network Neutrality: European Telecommunications Packet Regulations rejected 

    EU: media lobby’s monitoring proposal rejected

    The Telecommunications Package will not prescribe uninterrupted monitoring of the internet as demanded by the Conservatives on behalf of the media and entertainment industry. On Monday evening, the Industry, Research and Energy Committee (ITRE) and the Internal Market and Consumer Protection Committee (IMCO) of the European Parliament voted on around 1,000 changes to the EU Telecom rules, consolidated into over 30 amendments. The compromise proposal put forward by the rapporteur for the draft framework directive, Catherine Trautmann, was accepted. The Conservatives are said to have become more sceptical about “internet monitoring”.

    Read the full article.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 10:42 am on July 7, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Network Neutrality: FFII urges action on the European Telecommunications Packet Regulations, first reactions 

    Today the European Parliament is going to vote on proposed amendments to the telecommunications packet regulation, below an excerpt of FFII press release and Kathy Sinnott reactions.

    European Parliament rushes towards Soviet Internet

    Brussels, 04 July 2008 — Amendments to the European Telecommunications directive being rushed through the European Parliament propose a “Soviet internet” where software publishers and internet service providers watch traffic and data for Hollywood. Software and services that run on the internet would have to ask for permission of the regulators.

    Some amendments to the European Telecommunications directive allow administrative authorities in each Member State to define which are the authorised software applications for the internet. Parts of the directive should be implemented by the member states through requiring specific “technical features” in electronic communications networks. Live-analysis and filtering compose a pre-requisite for a “Soviet style” censorship environment.

    Read the full press release, below Kathy Sinnott’s press release.

    Kathy Sinnott MEP for Munster will be voting against a series of amendments to the European Telecommunications Directive designed to give the EU control over citizen’s internet usage. The proposed amendments to the could force internet service providers to turn over information on customers and monitor their internet usage. It could also force software makers to include spyware in their products to allow not only governments but also corporations to monitor citizen’s activities whether or not they are suspected of unlawful behaviour.

    Kathy Sinnott MEP said “I am a great proponent of net neutrality. The reason the internet is what it is today, is that no-one owns it and no company or government has as yet taken control over it. These amendments being pressed by some MEP’s seek to move Europe closer to the Chinese internet model where usage is monitored and where an individual goes online can be curtailed. This will give vast control over our lives to governments and in some cases corporations. I believe that law enforcement agencies should be allowed to pursue specific targets (eg. child pornography, terrorism) but monitoring the
    entire populace is not the way to go about it. These intrusions into our privacy would be unacceptable and I will be urging my colleagues to vote down all such amendments on July 7th.”

    Read also Philippe Aigrain’s post on the subject.

    Technorati Tags: Network Neutrality, net neutrality, FFII, European Parliament, Kathy Sinnott

     
  • Egor Grebnev 10:00 am on June 30, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    The Russian schools Linux pilot goes nationwide 

    The pilot project to migrate schools of three Russian regions to Free Software has recently expanded its geography. Now it is possible for the schools outside of Tatarstan, Perm krai and Tomsk region to voluntarily apply for participation by completing a special form (Russian) published on the project website.

    The project, if successful, may be the first step towards large-scale migration of Russian secondary education instutitions and, consequently, of the other state agencies to Free Software as President Medvedev stated last year (Russian) while being the First Deputy Prime Minister.

    Children in the Putino village of Perm Krai running Linux

    Children in the Putino village of Perm Krai running Linux

    It is a hot summer for the project contractors since the schools must be migrated before September 1, when the new academic year starts. By now, according to the official website of Armada, the consortium that unites the firms involved in the project, the project is slightly ahead of schedule. Moreover, Armada’s CEO Igor Gorbatov expects (Russian) the total number of schools migrated to Free Software to surpass the target number of 1000 (the goal is to migrate 50% schools in the central cities and 20% in the rest of the three regions) so that there may be 2000 or even 5000 schools.

    According to project statistics (Russian, but the numbers are quite self-explanatory) published by Armada on June 4, only 182 schools of 1084 had been migrated. However, the project members are actively promoting Free Software, the most notable activity being the on-site install seminars that are organized almost every week in various towns and villages of Perm Krai.

    Technorati Tags: Russia, schools, migration, Armada, free software, Medvedev, Perm, Tatarstan, Tomsk, open source

     
    • exelens 5:07 am on July 1, 2008 Permalink

      Yes! We migrate to Linux in schools. But our distros is really sux.

      We have 2 distros
      1 alt linux. Distr don’t have Russian support in console =( All messages on English. Its not a fanny, Russian Linux with minimal russification.
      2 asp Linux. Distr is a copy Fedora 9 =))

      Many peoples in Russia prefer Ubuntu or Mandriva.
      I prefer Ubuntu =) and write blog about Ubuntu on Russian.

    • Egor Grebnev 3:51 pm on July 1, 2008 Permalink

      Well, as far as I remember, the necessity of translation in console has been a point of discussion. Although ALT Linux had better made at least an option to enable it, I agree.

      But the question that the government is trying to solve is not which distribution to choose (things would have been far too simple this way) but rather who will provide the necessary technical support, educational resources for teachers and kids and who will make all the models of hardware that are deployed in schools Linux-compatible.

    • Jocke 3:18 pm on July 3, 2008 Permalink

      Why dont you use Solaris instead? Solaris is an Enterprise operating System Unix that has long drifted systems in Wall Street, etc. Very very reliable. Not like Linux which is not that good. See yourself, one of the Linux kernel developers states that Linux kernel is buggy:
      http://lwn.net/Articles/285088/

      Solaris has better performance and is more stable than Linux:
      http://lethargy.org/~jesus/archives/77-Choosing-Solaris-10-over-Linux.html

      Download and try Solaris for free from
      http://www.opensolaris.org

    • Egor Grebnev 6:05 pm on July 3, 2008 Permalink

      As far as I know, there were about five firms that placed bids for the schools project, but none of them offered Solaris.

    • Randy Fisher 1:49 am on July 5, 2008 Permalink

      This is great news.

      An important benefit of using Open Office is the ability to save / export content in mediawiki format, so that it can be saved to a wiki.

      I am involved with WikiEducator, a fast-growing community of formal and informal educators – developing a free and open version of the world’s education curriculum by 2015 (in line with the UN’s Millennium Development Goals). WikiEd is connected to the Wikimedia Foundation, and uses its technology engine. http://www.wikieducator.org

      This development is important to us, because as Open Office and FOSS solutions become more pervasive, then educators can more easily develop open educational content, which they can use, share and remix – and further add value for local purposes.

      We offer free wiki skills training to any educator, and really anyone who is interested in learning this valuable life-skill. Please visit: http://www.wikieducator.org/Learning4Content

      – Randy Fisher aka wikirandy

    • Egor Grebnev 1:06 pm on July 5, 2008 Permalink

      Randy,

      Thanks for your message. I am not directly involved in the project at the moment, and changing its development is out of my power. However, I agree that migration to Free Software must involve not only hardware and software migration, but also development of new skills and new educational approaches, which is far more difficult.

      We must admit that nobody is still fully aware how we should use modern computing in education, and I think that the school eduction of the future is currently being forged in the project like yours. Hopefully, the need to focus on educational issues will later be acknowledged by the Russian authorities, and then we may become not only a pioneer in FOSS migration, but also in revealing of FOSS capabilities to their full extent.

    • ubuntu33 2:57 am on July 7, 2008 Permalink

      EXELENS:

      Yes.. I agree..i think Ubuntu is better and much easier for new users..

      Maybe you can bring a ubuntu-cd to school and show your teachers?

  • Roberto Galoppini 6:45 am on June 27, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: Italy seen from UK, by Matthew Aslett 

    To coincide with EURO 2008, Matthew Aslett is embarking on a virtual European tour, taking a look at open source policies and deployment projects in the 16 nations that are competing in the tournament.

    We lost with Spain, and Matthew wrote his Italian Open Source Tour.

    Key policies:
    In October 2002, a commission for free software in public administration was established to study open source adoption. in May 2003 CNIPA (Centro Nazionale per l’Informatica della Pubblica Amministrazione) published a study (PDF in Italian) that recommended (amongst other things) that public offices should neither prohibit nor penalize the use of OSS packages. A working group later produced guidelines (PDF in Italian) as to how to remain compliant with the recommendations.

    The Italian government put its money where its mouth was in December 2006 as Italian budget law committed €30m over three years to projects that stimulate the information society (although what happened to those funds is open to question) while in May 2007 Italy launched its own repository of open source software for public administrations, the Collaborative Development Environment.

    In June 2007 Italian Minister of Reform and Innovations in Public Administration, Luigi Nicolais, announced the creation of the second Open Source Commission to define guidelines for public procurement of open source software. In May 2008 it published its first draft report.

    Key projects:
    National open source success stories include the Ministry of Justice, which has adopted Red Hat Enterprise Linux, as has the Ministry of Economics and Finance.

    Meanwhile the National Institute of Design and Mint is using JBoss, and Corte dei Conti is also using Red Hat Enterprise Linux.

    In July 2007 the IT department of the Italian Parliament presented plans for the migration of 200 servers and more than 3,500 desktop PCs to Linux and OpenOffice. The migration was due to begin in September and take two years.

    Regional government projects include Cremona, Foggia, Rome, Tuscany, Emilia Romagna, Genoa, Bologna, Balzano, Savona, Umbria, and Tuscany again.

    More details are available of Rome’s open source policy, Genova’s OpenOffice trials, Bologna’s open source projects, and Bolzano’s FUSS project.

    Read the full article.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 11:17 am on June 22, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: Lazio e-Citizen, secretly open source compatible 

    epractice.eu, the portal created by the European Commission offers a service for the professional community of eGovernment, eInclusion and eHealth practitioners, reported about Lazio e-Citizen, a digital inclusion project.

    The programme responded to European directives on the Lisbon Strategy and its objectives were to increase the residents’ awareness of the importance of digital literacy, the benefits that e-skills bring to their personal and professional lives, and to fight against social exclusion. The project developed a strategy to bridge the digital divide based on specific criteria: gender, age and skill levels.

    SecretDon’t be a secret keeper by *Drangongly*

    I asked Alessandra Devitofrancesco (ECDL foundation), author of the Lazio e-Citizen case reported on epractice to tell me more, and she kindly put me in touch with the AICA (ECDL member) responsible of the initiative, Pierpaolo Maggi.

    He explained me that the project has been developed using the open source course management system Moodle, and that the portal is accessible also through Firefox and Netscape. On the contrary the article on epractice and also e-citizen FAQ report (bold emphasis is mine):

    The schools, universities and Permanent Territorial Centres which were involved in the Lazio e-Citizen project were chosen according to different technological requirements:

    • Availability of one or more rooms with at least 12+5 desks and Internet access (ADSL or wireless)
    • LAN network among all desks and shared printer
    • PC Pentium 4 (or superior) or equivalent (i.e. AMD)
    • Windows 2000 or later versions
    • Browser: Internet Explorer 6.0 or superior
    • Accessories: audio set and headphones: CD ROM reader, minimum video resolution SVGA 800×600

It is time for outing, I publicly invite project’s promoters to disclose the specific technology choice (moodle), how it has been used and, last but not the least, telling people that the portal is accessible to open source.

eAccessibility and eInclusion are definitely also about allowing open source users to access information.

Technorati Tags: eAccessibility, eInclusion, digital literacy, digital divide, moodle, lazio e-citizen, course management system, epractice, Lazio

 
  • Roberto Galoppini 4:15 pm on June 20, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: France beats Italy 4-0! 

    SYSTEM@TIC PARIS-REGION, a competitiveness cluster aimed at developing the local economy and enterprises’ competitiveness, using partnership and training to produce and deliver enabling innovations, just run its third internal convention. Among the five thematic groups, since October 2007 has been included a technology-oriented working group on open source (Logiciel Libre).

    ParisParis, capital du logiciel libre by Koninho

    Roberto Di Cosmo, professor at the university of Paris-Diderot and president of the Logiciel Libre working group, invited me to join the event to learn more about what is going on in the Paris area in the free software arena.

    Francois Bancilhon, Mandriva’s CEO, is the vice-president of the open source thematic group, while in the council are sitting representatives from big firms like Cap Gemini, Bull, C-S, along with people from INRIA, university Pierre et Marie Curie and Nuxeo.

    Roberto explains that the goal of this group is to help structure the open source ecosystem in the Paris area by federating research laboratories, SMEs and big firms through R&D projects, partially supported by public funding in the standard scheme of competitivenes clusters.

    The state played a key role, by providing a framework, the competitiveness cluster, and the funding necessary to catalyze the interest of the actors. On the other side, this framework has been put at work in the particularly fertile ground of the Paris area, that hosts 50% of the ITC R&D of France, with a significant presence of Open Source ISV, a large number of research centers and Universities with IT laboratories, that have a long tradition of contributing to Free Software, and an exceptionally high concentration if IT expenditures.

    Roberto, how System@tic allocates resources to the projects?

    A distinguishing feature of the R&D projects in a competitiveness cluster, is that they must bring together at least two industrial partners and a research laboratory. In the case of our group, resources are allocated in the following manner: 59% SMEs, 26% laboratories, 15% big firms. The projects go through a rigorous evaluation process, first inside the group, then at the level of the cluster, and then in the services of the ministry of Industry, the region, and the departments of the Paris area.

    During the first year public investments sum up to less than five millions euro, less than half of the how much has been allocated for open source software by the Italian budget law last year, this year and next one. Italy is investing more money actually, but it is still unclear how such investments will eventually benefit the IT Italian ecosystem, though.

    Italy is still missing a clear strategy about how to foster the Italian open source ecosystem through training, education, research and outreach, while France apparently has found its own path for developing it.

    Dominique Vernay, Systematic president, during his opening speech congratulated the Open Source group for the speed with which it has started 4 high quality R&D projects, integrating quickly in the Systematic infrastructure.

    Marc Lipinski – vice president of the Conseil Régional de l’Ile de France for higher education, research and innovation – gave a particular importance to the role of this group while addressing the over 400 delegates present in the room, stressing its creation as one of the most significant events in the last year for Systematic.

    During coffee-breaks I spoke with few French open source actors, among others Cedric Thomas (OW2), Ludovic Dubost (Xwiki), Stéfane Fermiger (Nuxeo), Daniel Schaefer (Kalis), but also with open source customers, like Denis Teyssou (AFP) or Marie Buhot-Launay (Paris Region Economic Development Agency), inward investment adviser for ISV companies wanting to invest in the Paris area.

    People had a very positive feeling with regard to the approved open source projects, and looking at projects like scribo is easy to share their thoughts.

    SCRIBO – Semi-automatic and Collaborative Retrieval of Information Based on Ontologies – aims at algorithms and collaborative free software for the automatic extraction of knowledge from texts and images, and for the semi-automatic annotation of digital documents. SCRIBO has a total budget of 4.3M? and is partially funded by the French administration. It brings 9 participants together: AFP, CEA LIST, INRIA, LRDE (Epita), Mandriva, Nuxeo, Proxem, Tagmatica and XWiki.

    Italy beat France on a soccer field, but on the open source ground we have a lot to learn from them.

    Technorati Tags: France, Italy, Open Source Government, ecosystems, DominiqueVernay, RobertoDCosmo, MarcLipinski, FrancoisBancilhon, Scribo, System@tic

     
    • Djordje Lukic 12:08 am on June 24, 2008 Permalink

      Hm… I wonder why the hell Di Cosmo didn’t tell his students about this …

  • Roberto Galoppini 5:55 pm on June 13, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Italian Elections: The Province of Agrigento has an open source candidate 

    Provincial elections will take place in the province of Agrigento over this week end, and apparently Agrigento has its own best open source candidate, Eugenio d’Orsi.

    AgrigentoAgrigento by Stefano Liboni

    I totally agree with William Hurley, explaining the importance of considering candidates also from this perspective:

    Open source is in a position to influence patent reform and help the small businesses that drive our economy. Shouldn’t we consider taking a look at the candidates from this perspective? I thought allowing people to share their opinion on who they see as the best “open source candidate” would be a good way to start a larger discussion.

    Assoli, the Italian Association for Free Software, earlier asked Italian Parliament candidates to engage themselves to promote the use of free software, maybe similar initiatives in the future will cover also provincial elections.

    Technorati Tags: Italian elections, open source government, Agrigento, EugeniodOrsi, Assoli, WilliamHurley

     
    • Giovanni Spoto 2:14 am on June 15, 2008 Permalink

      This information is misleadingly and is not true because the Arnone’s plan includes a part of open source philosophy, too! You can find the complete plan at the link http://www.peppearnone.net/ultime/programma.html
      A part of the plan:
      “sposeremo la filosofia alla base dell’open source, favorendo la partecipazione attiva di volontari allo sviluppo di quei processi necessari affinché il ‘sistema provincia’ assicuri delle risposte pronte”.

      Best Regards,
      Giovanni Spoto

    • Roberto Galoppini 9:18 am on June 15, 2008 Permalink

      Hi Giovanni,

      I didn’t know that also Peppe Arnone is in favor of open source, thank you to point it out. Let’s have a look at the two different approaches now.

      Eugenio D’Orsi’s press release reports:

      Perché lo slancio nell’adozione e lo sviluppo di soluzioni non diventi una semplice dichiarazione di intenti, magari prendendo la forma di una delibera di giunta a cui non seguano azioni concrete, è mia intenzione attivare un dialogo consultivo con le realtà associative e imprenditoriali sul territorio, e grazie al loro contributo definire un piano di azione efficace, che consenta alla pubblica amministrazione di efficientare il processo di acquisizione e utilizzo di soluzioni aperte,permettendo al tempo stesso alle imprese di contribuire positivamente a questa azione.

      According to that Eugenio D’Orsi wants to open up the dialog with associations and companies, in order to collaboratively define a plan to efficientize the IT procurement process. The role of IT firms seems central in his vision.

      Peppe Arnone instead is willing to bring in the equations volunteers to help the province to promptly answer citizens’ needs.

      Open source for public administrations is about foster open source ecosystems or is about involving volunteers?

      Let’s see what is going to happen after the elections..

  • Roberto Galoppini 6:51 pm on June 11, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    IDABC: European Interoperability Framework Info Day, Brussels 25 June 

    On June 25, the IDABC unit of the European Commission will organize an Information Day on the novelties of the upcoming new version of the European Interoperability Framework (EIF) which is currently under preparation.

    Promoting the concept of interoperable systems is at the heart of the IDABC strategy. Taking into account the progress made in this area, the rapid evolution of the technology and the wish to no longer be limited to the IDABC context, a second version of the EIF has been prepared. This second version has been written in close collaboration with the relevant Commission services and with the Member States. Other, indirect stakeholders also provided their input.

    The Info Day will take place on 25 June 2008 in Brussels. The registration is open until 16 June 2008.

    More details on the Info Day can be found at http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/en/document/7649

    Register to the IDABC web page to get acquainted to the free services/publications/ conferences of IDABC by filling in the online form.

    Technorati Tags: IDABC, EIF, interoperability

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 10:14 am on June 8, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: Ideas for ForumPA 2009 

    Leo Sorge, editor-in-chief of some important italian IT magazines, after my open source round-table at ForumPA contacted me for an interview for 01net magazine, and I took the chance to talk about what is missing here.

    PotentialOpen Source: our potential? by Kimberlee della Luce

    As a matter of fact the Italian IT market is highly fragmented, just like by other European countries the vast majority of IT firms are small, or very small. As results from a survey recently conducted by the Observatory of the European SMEs the dimension of a company is a critical success factor:

    Overall, the larger the enterprise, the more likely it is to have turnover from exports: almost hree in ten – 28% – of LSEs, but only 7% among micro-enterprises reported exports.

    Barriers to innovation are always the same:

    EU SMEs regard four factors as constituting equally important barriers to innovation: problems in access to finance, scarcity of skilled labour, a lack of market demand and expensive human resources. The larger an enterprise, the more likely it is to report problems in finding the necessary human resources, and the less likely it is to report difficulties in getting he financial resources that are necessary for innovative activity.

    Mind the Bridge and similar initiatives can help Italian startups to get VCs’ attention, people like Fabrizio Capobianco are the living proof that there is a way to get funded by North-American investors. ForumPA can definitely take advantage of his experience to help other Italians to follow his path.

    Competence networks, incubators and technology valleys are very important to deliver innovation and to access the required information to conduct business, as results from another survey of the Observatory:

    The following barriers to networking, specific to smaller high-tech firms, can be identified: (i) Often there is a lack of a ‘co-ordinator’, which might be an agency or a larger leading firm. (ii) Small firms, in contrast to large ones, have a short-term perspective and expect quick and concrete results. But research networking is comparably time-intensive and results are not immediately visible. To reduce efforts co-operation is kept simple and built with only very few partners. (iii) It is difficult to find a balance between the privacy of information and the necessary knowledge sharing.

    Roberto Di Cosmo in Paris is leading an entrepreneurial hub bringing together local SMEs and local public administrations. I believe that his experience could be of great help to foster communities of interests to develop products and solutions for the Italian public administration market.

    Last but not least I think that Italy should learn from others’ experiences, listening to ‘veterans’ like Petri Räsänen to understand possibilities and challenges using open source to help regional growth.

    Gianni, we got start to work on it as soon as possible. Right?

    Technorati Tags: PetriRäsänen, FabrizioCapobianco, RobertoDiCosmo, competence center, open source hub, public administration, observatory of european smes, forumpa, mind the bridge

     
  • c
    Compose new post
    j
    Next post/Next comment
    k
    Previous post/Previous comment
    r
    Reply
    e
    Edit
    o
    Show/Hide comments
    t
    Go to top
    l
    Go to login
    h
    Show/Hide help
    shift + esc
    Cancel