Updates from March, 2008 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Roberto Galoppini 10:02 pm on March 28, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source at Microsoft: Microsoft engages SourceSense to develop a new version of Apache POI, some background 

    Microsoft and Sourcesense recently announced that are partnering to jointly contribute to the development t of a new version of Apache POI, an Apache top level project.

    Apache POI support for Open XML is now in development, to get here took about one year and the first release is expected to be available during the second quarter of 2008.Being personally involved in the process from the very beginning, I want to tell you about how building bridges and find ways to make Microsoft and Open Source firms work together is coming true.

    bridgeA useful bridge by petetaylor

    Last year I have been consulting to Microsoft Italy to help them to better understand the free software principles and the business model and to validate their thoughts on how to find ways to cooperate with the FOSS world on interoperability, licensing schemas and possibly joint initiatives.

    Andrea Valboni, Microsoft Italy CTO, at that stage was involved in the OOXML process, and one of the point of discussion about that format was: how people can use IT, how developers can take advantage from it. The issue of a reference implementation was coming out in the debate of that time. Here the full story, in Andrea’s words:

    I was discussing this over the phone with Roberto Galoppini (we have been not always on the same page,but our interaction have been always very respectful and intellectually honest), he was not very much convinced that a reference implementation could help developers, although a good idea. His point of view was more in favor of a set of libraries that can avoid developers to enter into the format’s details and concentrate on the application functionalities. I then asked whether he knew someone that can be interested in doing this.

    Having been the founder of the Italian open source consortium (CIRS) I do know many Italian open source companies, and I knew I had the perfect match with Sourcesense, an italian-rooted Open Source systems integrator with a strong international outreach and a great track record in participation to Open Source communities: I knew Gianugo Rabellino, Sourcesense’s CEO and a well know member of the Apache Software Foundation, was and is the right man for the job, and I was in touch with Marco Bruni, founder of Pro-netics group, an Italian IT group with solid Open Source roots and the company behind Sourcesense. I added two and two, and I made introductions.

    Getting back to Andrea’s tale, here how it goes on:

    So a beautiful sunny morning some days after that talk, I was sitting in a bar in Rome, having a coffee with Roberto and Marco Bruni, discussing about formats and listening to opinions of an open source company’s manager. Also the dialog I had with Marco was very open and frank, we both explained our reciprocal points of view and ideas, then he talked about Java libraries they are using to access Office binary formats. As I asked for more info, he talked me about the Jakarta/POI project [Java API To Access Microsoft Format Files] of the Apache Foundation.

    Sometime after that meeting, Gianugo was sitting in our office at Segrate, explaining to me and few legals the Apache License and more in general the open source licensing and how the Apache Foundation is working and the communities rules working under this umbrella: he was pretty clear, that’s are the rules, if we would like to create a cooperation.

    And it happened, the agreement took form day after day.

    I am glad I have been helping to make it happen playing the open source hub role, I really wish this partnership to be the first of many other involving open source firms, possibly European and Italian ones!

    Technorati Tags: commercial open source, microsoft, sourcesense, marcobruni, pro-netics, sourcesense, apache, POI, OpenXML

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 12:29 pm on March 27, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Monitoring: Groundwork 5.2 released, an interview with David Dennis 

    Groundwork, the provider of the open source based IT management and network monitoring solution, announced at OSBC the availability of GroundWork 5.2, a more scalable and extensible version of the product.

    Within the system and network monitoring market the Big 4 (BMC, CA, HP ed IBM) are starting to loose their comparative advantage relative to open source solutions like Groundwork, since open source solutions can provide comparable scalability and distributed deployment options at a smaller cost. On the other hand they are probably retaining a comparative advantage in areas such as multi-OS software deployment systems, asset tracking, demand management, etc.

    Considering that IT environments within large organizations run a mix of proprietary and open source software on a variety of platforms, also open source management solutions need to coexist with to support customers’ needs. I asked David Dennis, senior director of product marketing at Groundwork, some more questions about Groundwork’s hybridization strategy and open source projects participation.

    How an open source challenger like GroundWork could create a system-wide positive disruption in combination with the entrenched Big 4 players?

    GroundWork is able to integrate very well into existing enterprise Big 4 deployments. Customers of GroundWork operate using both GroundWork and closed source applications, allowing operators to continue using processes they are used to, while replacing the costs of licensed agents. When there is little functional difference between open and closed source options, integration frees financial resources to be used on additional initiatives.

    The ramifications of this are clear: to gain the greatest benefit from open source disruptive challenges to the Big 4 status quo, savvy IT departments will look for solutions that play nicely with the proprietary systems (that are likely to remain entrenched in the near future), thus creating a positive disruptive benefit to the datacenter as a whole.

    Groundwork put together at work many open source projects (among others Ganglia, Nagios, Cacti, NeDi, php-Weathermap, Sendpage, RRDtool Nmap and many more). How are you perceived by those communities and at which extent do you participate to those projects?

    Here are examples of components we’ve contributed back to the community:

    Nagios scalability improvements that dramatically increase Nagios capacity.

    NSCAfe Forwarding Engine: an improvement on (Nagios) NSCA engine to support large installations.

    HP OpenView Feeder: Displays output from GroundWork Monitor in OV.

    WMI Plug-ins: Enables monitoring of Windows devices and services.

    Ganglia plug-in module: alllows Ganglia data to be fed into Nagios for alerting.

    We support the communities of the individual projects that GroundWork Monitor is composed of. We have sponsored and host the project team meetings (“Project in Residence” events): we’ve done this for Cacti
    and Ganglia.

    We convene a Project Lead Council where the Project Leads get to meet and share ideas. Out of these meetings, we’ve had these successes that benefit the broader community of open source IT monitoring users.

    Sometimes we act as a ‘broker’ between projects. For example,Matt Massie of Ganglia talked to Tobi Oetiker of RRDtool about making changes to RRDtool that made Ganglia more efficient. Also, Remo Rickli of NeDi added
    php-Weathermap integration, developed by Howard Jones. Kees Cook added SMS messaging capability to SendPage as a result of one our Council meetings.

    Groundwork _Enterprise_ is a proprietary software solution based on many open source projects, and while is not leading any of them it is engaged in the coordination of some inter-projects collaborations, an interesting form of lucrative coopetition.

    Still an open source firm, in my opinion, an interesting one.

    Technorati Tags: commercial open source, groundwork, ganglia, RRDtool, nagios, cacti, nedi, lucative coopetition, open source monitoring

     
    • NediNMS 11:00 pm on February 6, 2009 Permalink

      The best part of groundwork is NeDi. I love using NeDi and is has streamlined my enterprise IT functions greatly when it comes to Cisco products. However, groundwork as a whole does a great job combining many different tools into one package.

  • Roberto Galoppini 1:16 pm on March 24, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Mobile: Volantis eventually released Mobility Server under the GPLv3 

    Few months ago Volantis announced that was about to release its Mobility Server Community Edition to the open source community under the GNU General Public License version 3, starting making it available immediately as a free download under a proprietary license.

    On the 19th of March Volantis released the Mobility Server, opening 1.2 million lines of code, the result of seven years’ of development as reported by the press release.

    What is Volantis Mobility Server Community Edition?

    The Community edition includes the Volantis Multi-Channel Server (MCS), Volantis Message Preparation Server (MPS) and Volantis Media Access Proxy (MAP), as well as a significant proportion of the Volantis Device Database and Eclipse-based developer tools.

    Reading the Volantis Mobility Server Overview I understand that to get full access to the Volantis Device Database you need to buy the Professional Edition. Moreover if you want to use the Device Database directly with other commercial applications that are not using Mobility Server for rendering, the Device Database edition is required.

    Volantis making available Device database updates from time to time has little chance to get voluntary contributions among individual developers (as seen with WURFL or Funambol), and it is probably targeting a different audience:

    Telefonica has a strong desire to work with open source projects which is why we created the OpenMovilForum project. It’s also why we fully support the idea that Volantis develops its own open source initiative.
    (Luis Almansa, Senior Project Manager at Telefonica)

    Andrea Trasatti, Director of Device Initiatives at dotMobi and WURFL cofounder, kept me in the loop about the news he appears to be interested in. After reading the table comparing the Community edition and the Professional one I am convinced that dotMobi can’t take advantage of the open source one. I see consultants like Nick Lane being happy with the Community edition, as probably are happy SMEs that couldn’t afford the proprietary version to fulfill their own private needs.

    Also Small IT firms can now step into this market, and I suggest Mark to consider to get the Mobility Server listed in the Ohloh open source directory.

    Volantis primary aim seems to be setting industry standards, though. The company has results also from the press release has  contributed to a community standards process to create within , driven by the W3C the DIAL specification. As a matter of fact XDIME, a Web development markup language, has been created by Volantis to comply with the DIAL specification and is designed to create content viewable on any mobile device.

    Am I looking forward to speak again with Mark Watson, Volantis Systems CEO and sort out more first hand information.

    Technorati Tags: open source mobile, funambol, wurfl, andreatrasatti, markwatson, volantis, DIAL, telefonica, openmovilforum

     
    • Andrea Trasatti 5:04 pm on March 26, 2008 Permalink

      dotMobi has an agreement with Volantis that lets us incorporate data from their device database. The agreement is not linked to the open-source initiative that they took and this means that DeviceAtlas, the device database by dotMobi, is entitled to use their data and will not breach the GPL.

    • Aensen 10:18 am on May 30, 2008 Permalink

      Of course Volantis is also a partner of DeviceAtlas and we are working closely with.Registration Open for All dotMobi Road Show Dates – May 20, 2008.www.softreviews.com

  • Roberto Galoppini 9:06 pm on March 19, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Webinar: Getting comfortable with Copyleft, by OpenLogic 

    Although there are dozens of open source licenses, the terms in copyleft licenses such as GPLv2 and GPLv3 seem to cause the most angst for enterprises using open source. Companies are concerned that they are putting their own IP at risk when using these licenses. In this webinar, you?ll gain a better understanding of copyleft licenses and how to manage the risks for your organization.

    Topics covered in this webinar will include:

    • An overview of copyleft — what it is and isn’t
    • Managing potential risks to the organization
    • Overview of potential lawsuits and recent cases
    • Answers to common questions on copyleft licenses

    Presenters in this webinar include:

    Stormy Peters – Director of Community and Partner Programs for OpenLogic
    Attorney Robert J Scott – Managing Partner of Scott & Scott

    Register now.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 2:19 pm on March 16, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Books: a book in Italian about Asterisk 

    There are quite a few books on Asterisk out there, but if you can manage Italian I wish to recommend you this one: “Asterisk” (Italian).

    I happened to meet in person the author, Diego Gosmar, charing the roundtable on Open Source VoIP at the VON Europe Conference held in Rome in November.

    Being the second book on Asterisk written by Diego and his coauthors, it goes pretty much beyond installation and protocols for VoIP, covering in depth topics like how to implement SS7 applications carrier grade with Asterisk or billing with astbill and WildiXbill, but also some spots on ENUM and wireless VoIP.

    Mark Spencer, original author of Asterisk, wrote a kind preface for the first book edited by Diego, closing as follows:

    It’s especially rewarding to see Asterisk growing in Italy, as I’ve always felt it was long past due time for the America to have something to give back to Italy in exchange for one of Italy’s most important contributions to computer science: the
    pizza!

    I really hope that the “Italian Open Source Pizza connection” will soon be appreciated also for things like this book 😉

    Technorati Tags: Apogeo, DiegoGosmar, Asterisk, Open Source VoIP, astbill, wildixbill, ENUM

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 9:59 am on March 15, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Q&A: David Wheeler Q&A session held during the “Open Source Software and DoD” webinar 

    To use OSS, does it need to be on the Department of Defense Intelligence Information System (DODIIS) approved list?

    The DoD has different rules for different kinds of systems and different uses, but in practically every case the rules have nothing to do with whether or not the program is OSS. So the question is really, “to use some program, does it need to be on approved list X?” The answer is “it depends on the circumstance”. So find out the rule for installing a proprietary COTS program for your circumstance, and follow the same rules when you wish to install an OSS COTS product. In some cases there’s secure installation guidance; see DISA’s Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NSA’s Security Configuration Guides. Many OSS programs are already on these lists. In some cases you may need to add the program to the approved list for your circumstance, so you’ll need to follow the process for getting the program on that list. In some cases it’s there but not obvious (e.g., the Linux kernel and many other OSS components are covered by the Unix STIG).

    Remember that OSS always (by definition) permits use for any purpose, as well as redistribution of the program without additional payment. That means that, by definition, the DoD always has an enterprise-wide license for the use of any OSS program. (Support is a different tale – if you want 24×7 phone support, you’ll need to pay for it. But I covered that in the talk.)

    Read the full Q&A session.

    [tags] DavidWheeler, DoD, open source, webinar[tags]

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 8:02 pm on February 29, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: IDABC reports first impressions on Ministry’s clarifications 

    Italian Open Source developers are dissatisfied with a clarification by the Ministry for Reform and Innovation on how it spent ten million euro last year earmarked for Open Source projects.

    With a six-page letter sent ten days ago by Beatrice Magnolfi, undersecretary for Innovation Policy, the ministry responded to a request by the Italian PostgreSQL user group, the Italian translators working on OpenOffice, the Italian Free Software Association and several Italian computer scientists.

    Roberto Galoppini, one of the submitters of that request, says the ministry’s  letter does not provide enough details and hardly mentions concrete Open Source projects. “It still is hard to tell if those ten million euro were spent on Open Source or not.” Galoppini and his colleagues will ask the minister to organise a public event. “Here, the ministry could disseminate information about Open Source and explain how these funds were spent.”

    The ministry writes how it last year decided to primarily fund projects dealing with digital innovation, education, health and on information projects meant for Italians abroad. The ministry writes it will support the application of Open Source solutions and will favour those projects allow public administrations to share and collaborate on software.

    The reply also details how it has spent some of the funds earmarked to favour Open Source projects. It lists agreements with the Italian region of Tuscany and Trento province, legal advice concerning projects at elementary schools and agreements with the ministry of Labour and the Ministry of Culture.

    The ministry adds that for projects in 2008 it will again give priority to Open Source software and other applications that allow sharing and reuse of software. It also expects to spend money on agreements with the ministry of Labour and Foreign Affairs, on projects for elementary schools and is defining measures to support the creation of a federal interoperable IT infrastructure.

    Source: IDABC. Read also Quintarelli’s blog (italian).

    Technorati Tags: Open Source Government, Italy, IDABC, Quintarelli

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 8:49 pm on February 28, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Micro-Blogging: The Pulse of Open Source, by Raven Zachary 

    While at the Open Source Think Tank Raven Zachary came up with the idea of creating the Pulse of Open Source, a new web application tailored to highlight open source activity on Twitter.

    Just as Raven I was also initially skeptical of this service, a sort of micro-blogging (140 characters or less) to share tiny URLs and no much more. But I was proven wrong, as Stormy Peters pointed out twitter could well be your cup of coffee, maybe also Matt Asay will change his mind at some time.

    One of the things I have found useful about Twitter besides following close friends is following people in my profession. The more I looked, the more interesting participants in the open source community I found on Twitter.

    Raven, I couldn’t say it better myself, I totally agree. Raven told me about his initiative -  based on a conversation he had with Ross Turk, Mark Hinkle, Reuven Cohen, and Aaron Fulkerson– at breakfast the very last day at Napa, and I am glad to be part of the ‘kernel’.

    As of launch today, the site is following 87 people and I expect that number to grow substantially over time. Take a look at who we follow. If you are an active participant in the open source community and would like to be included in this stream of consciousness, instructions are on the site about how to participate. I’m hoping that my colleagues Jay and Matt will take the hint and join Twitter, too. 451 colleagues Nick Patience, Vishy Venugopalan, and Rachel Chalmers are on Twitter. You can also track our analyst releases using the service.

    I wish the Pulse of Open Source all the best, but get to twitter now.. 😉

    Technorati Tags: twitter, RavenZachary, the451group, StormyPeters, MattAsay,  

     
    • sandeep 3:30 pm on June 24, 2008 Permalink

      Just confused by the article.
      I mean; is twitter a opensource application?

      Sorry if I misread.

    • Roberto Galoppini 6:41 pm on June 24, 2008 Permalink

      Twitter is definitely not an open source application. Raven Zachary created a web application to keep us updated with twitters from the open source community, as he explained:

      This is the stream of collective consciousness from the open source community on wTwitter. Who are we following? Take a look at the who we follow

  • Roberto Galoppini 11:07 am on February 26, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    OpenOffice.org Conference: Vote for Italy, now! 

    The next OpenOffice.org Annual Conference 2008 (OOoCon) will be held in one of the following locations, and it is up to you to choose which one: Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Beijing, China; Bratislava, Slovakia; Budapest, Hungary; Dundalk, Ireland; and Orvieto, Italy.

    OrvietoOrvieto (Duomo) by Mirjam75

    The biggest concentration appears to be in Europe, as far as John McCreesh – Marketing Program Lead of OpenOffice.org – himself reported. Holding the OOoCon in Beijing could bring the China-based developers into the fold, but it sounds pretty expensive for many of us.

    Today I asked my Linkedin contacts if they would vote for Orvieto, and I wish you all vote for us.

    John McCreesh writing about the different options stated:

    [..] I believe one European bid this year stands above the others, which is the bid from Italy. I believe the combination of an experienced organising team, a delightful warm location, and a thriving local community would be hard to beat. I would urge anyone wanting an OOoCon in Europe this year to unite behind Orvieto.

    Remember that voting closes on Friday 29th, vote it now!

    Technorati Tags: OpenOffice, OpenOffice.org, OpenOffice conference, OOoCon, Italy, Orvieto, JohnMcCreesh

     
    • Piergiorgio Lucidi 8:21 pm on February 27, 2008 Permalink

      Thank you for this post Roberto, I try to spread it as soon as possible!

      Good luck.

  • Roberto Galoppini 10:18 am on February 22, 2008 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Community Awards: SourceForge launches the 2008 Community Choice Awards 

    SourceForge.net launched the 2008 Community Choice Awards, the third edition of SourceForge awards program it is now open to all FOSS projects, and it includes new categories.

    I asked Ross Turk some feedback on the awards:

    I’m really excited about this year’s awards – we’re doing some cool new stuff! The big news, of course, is that we’re no longer restricting it to SourceForge.net projects, so any FOSS project can be nominated in any category. I think that’s huge.

    We have some new categories, too. We’ve pruned the ones from last year that weren’t very popular and added a few new ones that we think will cause people to stop and think.

    Also, this is the first year we’ll be selling sponsorships. It’s a way for us to fund a bigger, cooler party, and a way for us to provide our sponsors with good access to one of the coolest communities around.

    SourceForge allowing nominations for any open source project, not just those on SourceForge.net, it is definitely going to be much more interesting this year. I remember Matt Asay saying that participants had a tenuous grip on what “enterprise” means last year (firebird won), I guess opening will help in this direction.

    I am looking forward to see who is going to win the new category “Most Likely to Be the Next $1B Acquisition”..

    Technorati Tags: Open Source Award, SourceForge, MattAsay, RossTurk, Firebird

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel