Recent Updates Page 119 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Roberto Galoppini 9:01 am on January 10, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Embedded Linux: Nokia’s move 

    Nokia just launched a Developer Device Program, providing OS developers with Nokia N800 Internet Tablets at a discount, only 500 selected developers will be granted the special price (99 euro).

    Nokia through the Maemo.org project, a project meant for developers with personal or commercial interests in developing software for handhelds like Internet Tablets, is already maintaining firmware for its 770 and now for the N800 Internet tablet.

    Ari Jaaksi, head of Nokia’s open source software operations, said that he hopes to increase Nokia’s involvement in the open-source community, both taking and giving back code.

    Read Ari Jaaksi’s white paper documenting some of their experiences and learnings when building consumer products with open source.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 7:45 pm on January 9, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Embedded Linux: Motorola’s last move.. 

    To be a Linux-Motorola’s fun it’s not an easy task, but yesterday’s Motorola announcement made it nearly impossible for Linux enthusiasts
    Scott Durschslag, CVP of products at Motorola’s mobile device division, stated:

    The MotoRizr Z6 is the world’s first Linux-Java music phone integrating the full suite of Windows Media technologies. This will enable consumers to access whatever music content they want, from the music store they love, wherever they are, as simply and seamlessly as possible.”

    Read the full story.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 12:32 pm on January 9, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Free Software is just Free Software 

    Lars Wirzenius known to the large public either for being Torvalds’s friend, or to had been responsible for architectural design and project management of a great piece of software named Kannel, recently wrote about what does it mean to be free software developer.

    Answering someone having expectations about Free Software world being in the forefront protecting civil liberties and civil rights, wisely wrote:

    The thing that unites the free software developers, and the only thing that unites us, is that we make free software.

    I have never read before a well-known free software developer stating it so clearly, and I liked very much his conclusion:

    I’m a free software developer and the only thing about me you can deduce from that is that I develop free software.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 4:49 pm on January 8, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Franchising (more) 

    Open Source franchising is aimed at delivering to the market IT basic services using OSS, with a fixed-time fixed-price methodology meeting clearly defined performance criteria (SLA).

    Open Source franchising for customers is about getting business value with a shorter time of deployment, getting reliable solutions and services through certified franchisees instead of waiting for local resellers, known to spend little time management customers’ problems.
    As seen with Geeksoncall, there is space for growing in computer services franchise arena, and no one has explored yet such potential market using commercial open source software.

    Appropriating returns is not trivial for ventures making business with open innovation, but Sun could profit from running a partnership franchising program, offering franchisees the following services:

    • training;
      .
    • certifications;
      .
    • global marketing;
      .
    • subscription services;
      .
    • value added services (indemnification, benchmarking and stack assurance, mediation, etc).

    Sun besides fee incomes, will be fueling a profitable mechanism for selling its hardware products along with subscription services and value-added services through the franchising channel.

    Franchisees, delivering basic services with a standard methodology, can be perceived as more valuable then VAR channels, representing for the vendor a more effective distribution mechanism to medium-to-large buyers.

    Becoming a Franchisee require investing time and money to become proficient with Franchisor’s products and procedures, in order to be able to deliver services on time, on budget and respecting SLAs.

    Who might be interested in joining the OS franchise program?

    The Observatory of European SMEs noticed that:

    Small firms have a short-term perspective and expect quick and concrete results.

    So existing ventures are unlikely to apply at the very beginning, since small firms can’t afford to offer its personnel intensive training, as employees are needed in day-to-day activities.

    New ventures instead could join the franchising program, forming their business strategy without worrying about any earlier decision. Moreover Start-ups might apply knowing that belonging to a franchise can affect positively newness and smallness liabilities, and lower market entry barriers.

    Newness. Start-ups lack of relationships with any kind of stakeholder, while the Franchisor, as established firm, has the level of access, legitimacy, track of record and reputation required to aid effectively the franchisee to develop relationships. Otherwise the entrepreneur must somehow absorb any risk a customer should take to do business with her start-up.

    Smallness. A small firm can’t employ many people, and often is missing the required skills; a limited market presence and therefore a limited market power put small firms in a weak position in negotiations. The Franchisor’s network of enterprises can be helpful to locate skilled resources, where the fixed price policy defined by the Franchisor makes easier contractualization.

    Market Entry barriers.The skills and experience of the Franchisor, along with a strong brand and an international advertising and public relations programs can help start-ups to get into the market.

    Last but not least the cost of entry might cost less than ordinary computer service franchising business fares, see Geeksoncall fares to get an idea.

    Previous others’ posts and comments on open source franchising:

    Matt Asay’s post on his blog (my answer)
    Frank Hecker’s comments

    Matt Asay’s post on Infoworld
    James McGovern’s post
    Savio Rodrigues’s post
    Sergio Montoro’s post (spanish)

     
    • Frank Hecker 2:03 am on January 9, 2007 Permalink

      I looked at the Geeks On Call site — very interesting, and I think a good starting point for considering what a FLOSS franchising business would look like. Basically from a franchisee point of view the Geeks On Call business model appears to require only someone with the necessary franchise fee and some employees with the relevant certifications (Microsoft, etc.); Geeks On Call adds value through assistance with marketing, scheduling and dispatch, employee recruiting, tech support, and so on. Geeks On Call appears to concern themselves mainly with desktop hardware and software and networks (including firewalls, etc.), but apparently doesn’t support actual server-side applications (except perhaps stuff like Exchange).

      Here are some scenarios I can think of for a “Geeks On Call”-like franchise operation that goes beyond basic hardware and software support:

      1. Geeks On Call itself moves “up the stack” and begins installing and supporting server-side applications. Given there traditional orientation I suspect they’d extend their existing Microsoft partnership and do this based on Microsoft server applications (e.g., Exchange, Sharepoint, etc.).

      2. A hardware vendor like Sun goes into the franchising business using FLOSS server-side software, in the manner you suggest.

      3. A software vendor like Red Hat does this; Red Hat of course already has both a certification program and a growing stack of server applications software). They partner with a hardware vendor to handle the hardware part of the business.

      4. A more radical idea: Why install software locally at the customer’s premises? If you have a strong franchisor with deep experience in FLOSS, why not leverage that experience to host the relevant applications centrally like SalesForce.com, Google, etc? Then the franchisee would only be responsible for initial account setup (including data conversion and perhaps limited customization), customer training, and level 1 support; they wouldn’t have to worry about dealing with the customer’s operational issues (backup, server administration, and so on).

      Of course, this model doesn’t really serve the needs of a company like Sun (which wants to sell hardware) or Red Hat (which wants to sell RHEL subscriptions). However if a new company wanted to be just a franchisor (like Geeks On Call) and not be distracted by other lines of business (like selling hardware or software), then this is the model I think might work best. The company wouldn’t even need necessarily to build its own operational infrastructure; it could potentially piggyback on the infrastructure built by others (e.g., Amazon).

    • Roberto Galoppini 1:05 pm on January 9, 2007 Permalink

      I’m following your line of thought, and I totally agree from point 1 to 3.

      I understand reasons behind the more radical idea you depicted in point 4, I see Google trying to do this, they have no concern about their channel program: they’re much alike an (the) Internet Application Service Provider.
      But companies like to store their own data by their systems, at least so far, and it might be really tough to let they change their minds. And internet reliability might be an issue too, at least down here in Italy.

      And yes, as you observed this model doesn’t serve the needs of a company like Sun (which wants to sell hardware AND subscription) nor Red Hat.

    • Savio Rodrigues 2:30 am on January 10, 2007 Permalink

      Frank,

      One question about your “#4 A more radical idea”:

      What value is left on the table for the franchisee? The type of work that remains doesn’t appear to be valuable enough (in the eyes of the customer) to drive enough revenue or margins to make a franchise worthwhile. I could be wrong though.

    • Roberto Galoppini 5:54 pm on January 13, 2007 Permalink

      Savio are you saying that franchising business models are not valuable?
      Weather or not we talk about software I would say that franchising it’s a wealthy business: in 2001 only in US the Franchising Business provided 9,797,117 jobs, met a $229.1 billion payroll, and produced $624.6 billion of output.
      What I’m stating is that it makes a lot of sense for OS basic services, for all parties.

  • Roberto Galoppini 12:03 pm on January 8, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    US Copyright law unleashed 

    Thanks to the wonderful MIT OpenCourseWare, the free and open educational resource for educators, students, and self-learners around the world, now you can learn everything about:

    • structure of federal law;
      .
    • basics of legal research;
      .
    • legal citations;
      .
    • how to use LexisNexis®;
      .
    • the 1976 Copyright Act;
      .
    • copyright as applied to music, computers, broadcasting, and education;
      .
    • fair use;
      .
    • Napster®, Grokster®, and Peer-to-Peer file-sharing;
      .
    • Library Access to Music Project;
      .
    • The 1998 Digital Millennium Copyright Act;
      .
    • DVDs and encryption;
      .
    • software licensing;
      .
    • the GNU® General Public License and free software.

    The course is offered during the Independent Activities Period, a 4-week term at MIT that runs from the first week of January until the end of the month. Enjoy it!

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 10:04 am on January 8, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Women in Open Source 

    Google alerts let me know about the mini-conference “Women in Open Source” , will be guested by the upcoming Southern California Linux Expo on the 9th of February.

    The press release don’t have much of a fully formed agenda for the event yet, says shessuchageek . and since there are still speaker slots available send your talk proposals asap.

     
    • Savio Rodrigues 3:34 am on January 10, 2007 Permalink

      Thanks Roberto!

      I’ve forwarded the info to Alice Chou, who came over to the IBM WebSphere team as part of the Gluecode acquisition. Alice played a big part in the marketing strategy at Gluecode and is currently doing the same with IBM WAS CE. She knows her open source stuff!

    • Roberto Galoppini 3:22 pm on January 10, 2007 Permalink

      It sounds great, I hope they’ll manage to fill up nicely the agenda!

  • Roberto Galoppini 1:08 pm on January 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Google reader: trends, tricks but search! 

    I recently starting using Google reader, and I found interesting Brady Forrest post on O’Reilly Radar about Google reader’s trends, a page filled with graphs and widgets that keeps you up-to-date on your own usage.

    Reading the Official Google Reader Blog you can find many hints and adds-on, but what I’m really missing is a search facility within my feeds. Anne Curie, from Qlockwork, commenting Brady Forrest post agreed with me:

    I agreee that a search facility is very useful in this kind of tool. I use a tool called Qlockwork (http://www.workingprogram.com) that tracks where I spend my on-line time (as well as everything else I do). One of the most useful features is the ability to search. (Full disclosure: I’m a developer on Qlockwork, so I’m biased, I also forget to tag or bookmark stuff all the time so totally rely on search).

     
    • Roberto Galoppini 6:24 pm on January 25, 2007 Permalink

      Creating Structure with Folders and Tags

      As with many RSS aggregators, Google Reader allows you to create folders. These are similar to labels in Gmail although I didn’t see an easy way to rename them or set them up in advance. I could create a folder at the time I was assigning a feed or through the import process. I couldn’t first create my folders and then add my feeds.

      One way to get around this issue is to subscribe to any feed and create the folders you think you’ll need using Change folders… and the Create a new folder option. Then unsubscribe from that feed and your folder names will remain. This issue may only bother people who want to first set up their structure.

  • Roberto Galoppini 12:32 pm on January 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Science: Karim Lakhani 

    Professor Karim Lakhani, co-founder of the MIT-based Open Source research community and web portal. He has studied extensively the emergence of OSS communities and their innovation and product development strategies, and investigated how knowledge from outside of the organization can be put to use inside for innovation.

    Reading an interview with Lakhani,I enjoyed the following quotation,

    People often think about open source as a special case, as if such openness can only happen in software.

    Martha Lagace asked him how did he start to become interested in scientific problem solving

    In open source communities we see a vast degree of openness in which everybody can participate, but also the practice of broadcasting your work to everybody else. People continually broadcast their problems, others broadcast solutions, and the person with the problem is not always the one with the solution. Oftentimes, somebody else can make sense of both what the problem has been and what people are proposing as solutions, and can come up with a better answer.

    I also read a book by Dava Sobel about the longitude prize [Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Who Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of his Time]. Finding longitude at sea was one of the toughest economic, scientific, and technological problems up until the eighteenth century. Isaac Newton said the only way to solve the problem was through astronomical methods, but he was proven wrong because someone from rural Yorkshire, England, came up with a clock that could keep time at sea. Nobody had anticipated that that kind of invention was practical.

    About the difference between problem solving within OS communities and scientific circles

    Open source software developers are very pragmatic and focused on solving problems. Scientists are focused on problems too, but their priority is often publication and that can sometimes come in the way of openness and sharing. The ideals of science are, of course, openness, sharing, and no restrictions on the free flow of knowledge, but in practice that doesn’t happen much at all. Some scientists, however, are pushing back and many say they need to rethink how they conduct science.

    About risks related to opening problems to people outside the organization

    For firms, the first order risk is the loss of intellectual property, especially if you think about the fact that most firms and scientists believe that the problems they work on are actually their most important things. If you provide hints to competitors, it will reveal a lot of your strategy.

    I think it’s a legitimate concern, although practice doesn’t prove that out in the sense that even if other people know about the problems you’re working on or have seen your solutions, it’s very hard to implement those solutions in other settings. Knowledge is actually very sticky. Even if you reveal everything about what’s going on, there’s tacit knowledge behind a lot of scientific and technological activities.

    And the benefit of opening up your problems to outsiders is that in fact you can get novel solutions—quicker solutions than what the firm or R&D lab might develop. It also opens up new domains for the pursuit of knowledge and activities.

    But it’s still a very counterintuitive way of working.

    If you want to know more about outsiders, reputation and his research read the full story.

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 10:40 am on January 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open-Source Community tool: OpenServing, to boldly keep 100% of your revenues! 

    While reading MasterNewmedia I happened to know about OpenServing:

    Openserving extends the essence of the open source model — free software and content — to all aspects of web-based computing.

    Their service will offer soon free hosting, bandwidth and software for communities, promising to turn over 100% of advertisement profits.

    Read the full story and learn the key features of OpenServing.

     
    • Gregory Kohs 7:27 am on November 12, 2008 Permalink

      Of course, Openserving (run my Jimbo Wales) quickly failed, and fully and miserably.

      However, his nemesis, Gregory Kohs has been running a wiki successfully on the same model — contributors keep 100% of their own ad revenues — at MyWikiBiz.com. Over 37,000 pages and growing.

  • Roberto Galoppini 7:37 pm on January 5, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    The Open Source analysis wiki just launched 

    James MCGovern speaking with Raven Zachary , from The 451 Group, got the idea to ask other analyst firms to join him to collaboratively work on the notion of an open source industry analysis guide.

    In his post he reported some issues to be addressed, Barbara French from Tekrati also joined the informal community to develop a guide to working with industry analyst firms using open source licensing / analysis as part of their business model. So did James McGovern who said that the open source analysis wiki aims to answer some questions like:

    • what is open source analysis?
      .
    • Why is it different from traditional industry analyst models?
      .
    • How do we best engage with open source analysts?

    I believe is a very good start, the inter-firms collaboration works fine!

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel