Updates from August, 2007 Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Carlo Daffara 9:54 am on August 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open source collaboration: non-source code open projects 

    In the context of the joint research work with Roberto, I would like to present a small update in the OpenTTT project. OpenTTT is a EU-funded project (SSA-030595 INN7) that aims at bridging the separate worlds of technology transfer and open source software (OSS), by introducing novel methodologies for helping companies in the take up of technology.

    As part of the project, we are collecting examples of non-source code projects where collaboration or open licensing are critical, and prepared a listing of such activities. Such listing will be extended in the next weeks, also including previous work like the “Open Source Gift Guide” or a list of non software open source goods.

    As already discussed a large portion of work in OSS projects goes into non-code aspects, and as such should be investigated probably with the same interest that OSS commands today.

    Technorati Tags: openttt, EU projects

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 3:36 pm on July 17, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source CMS: Open Source CMS Awards, by Packt 

    Open Source CMS Awards, second edition. This year the UK Publisher Packt has expanded the Award for 2007 with an increase in prize money and the addition of new categories.  Nominations for each category will be open until Friday August 31.
    Last year my friends at Joomla! won, while Drupal placed second, but they are already working to pull ahead this year!

    Technorati Tags: Open Source CMS, CMS Awards, Joomla, Drupal

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 6:51 pm on July 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Internet Governance Forum: workshop proposals online for viewing&merging 

    The Internet Governance Workshop proposals submitted within the 30 June deadline have now been posted for viewing. Save the following dates:

    • Deadline for submitting proposal (abstracts + initial list of organizers ): 30 June.
      .
    • Completion of co-organizer and panellist arrangements and merge activities: July.
      .
    • Notification of selection – 31 July 2007.

    During July proponents of similar workshops will be encouraged to join forces and collaborate where it is feasible. Organizers of workshops are, therefore, expected to work with others who submit proposals on the same theme. A willingness to merge proposals is a requirement.
    The Government of Brazil will host in Rio de Janeiro on 12 – 15 November 2007 the second Internet Governance Forum meeting. The IGF website – run by the IGF Secretariat – supports the United Nations Secretary-General in carrying out the mandate from the World Summit on the Information Society with regard to convening a new forum for multi-stakeholder policy dialogue – namely the Internet Governance Forum.

    Technorati Tags: Internet Governance Forum, Open Consultation

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 5:46 pm on June 15, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Internet Governance Forum: updates for the next meeting 

    The Government of Brazil will host in Rio de Janeiro on 12 – 15 November 2007 the second Internet Governance Forum meeting. The IGF website – run by the IGF Secretariat – supports the United Nations Secretary-General in carrying out the mandate from the World Summit on the Information Society with regard to convening a new forum for multi-stakeholder policy dialogue – namely the Internet Governance Forum.
    Now a revised schedule for the Rio de Janeiro Meeting and a revised programme outline is available.

    Technorati Tags: Internet Governance Forum, Brasil, Open Consultation

     
  • Carlo Daffara 3:40 pm on June 4, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Production: not only code 

    Most people thinks that being “open source” means being coders or contributing patches, and it is still controversial how companies position themselves in the OSS market. Most people consider a company OSS when it contributes code to an OSS project, but nowadays a significant value of open source lies in non-code contributions.

    During previous research projects, I found several references to code contributions (and most online tracking services like Commits in Action or Ohloh but it is nearly impossible to find traces of non-code contributions. During the creation of the knowledge base of the COSPA project I found an amazingly well written report by the French Réseau National en Technologies Logicielles called “New economic models, new software industry economy” where I found a telling text snippet on the OpenCASCADE CAD framework:

    In the year 2000, fifty outside contributors to Open Cascade provided various kinds of assistance: transferring software to other systems (IRIX 64 bits, Alpha OSF), correcting defects (memory leaks…) and translating the tutorial into Spanish, etc. Currently, there are seventy active contributors and the objective is to reach one hundred. These outside contributions are significant. Open Cascade estimates that they represent about 20 % of the value of the software.

    This 20% is mainly non-code related, but it’s 20% of the project value nevertheless. This happens in a very vertical, and technical-oriented environment; but if we look at a highly successful open source project like KDE, we can find something like this:

    KDE From Aaron Seigo’s speech, in Akademy 2006

    Software development is just one of the tasks necessary to build a large scale, complex system like KDE, and I have no doubt that something similar applies to GNOME, Fedora or OpenSolaris.

    We should start thinking more about how to study non-code contributions, and how this relates to the commercialization of open source projects (and not only software).

    Technorati Tags: OpenCascade, Open Source Production, KDE

     
    • Ed Dodds 5:34 pm on June 5, 2007 Permalink

      I think this is why documentation and marketing are generally weak links in the OSosphere.

    • Antonio LdF 1:04 am on June 6, 2007 Permalink

      Do you already know me..
      I’m Antonio aka Forrest Camp; do you remember Rome and the barcamp?

      In these period I embraced completely the cause of my “Free Biz Projects” and I thought a lot.

      I use only open source software like Ubuntu, Gimp or Open Office.
      I would collaborate to implement them but I’m not a developer and I’ve no money to give.

      I’m a creative, I’m project manager and a marketing young man. I want to create a bridge between mktg and developers. I would help the open source to arrive to the main stream using approaches that probably the code contributors ignore or despise..

      The important thing is to search something that each one could do for open source and I would do everything in my power.
      Today I would send you a mail, but this comment is better!

      See you soon Roberto!

  • Roberto Galoppini 11:33 pm on May 16, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Government: Italy launches its Forge 

    The Minister of Reform and Innovations in Public Administration, Luigi Nicolais, and the President of the Center for the application of Italian Ministry of Innovation and Technology Politics (CNIPA), Livio Zoffoli, today announced the latest initiative of the Italian Open Source Observatory.

    The Collaborative Development Environment (ASC, Ambiente di Sviluppo Cooperativo) offers Italian Public Administrations a medium to co-develop open source applications with other public administrations, market players and research institutes.

    Public Administrations need software aimed at addressing specific needs, and the collaboration platform has been designed to help them to involve partners in developing software public goods.

    Luigi Nicolais commented:

    Public Administrations will benefit of the advantages of open source software now, beyond software customizing they will learn how to share it easier, eventually opening a market for software services and reducing time-to-market and costs of acquisition.

    He also added that:

    Among e-Government’s strategic lines it is necessary to study and define a model to use open source software assuring economic sustainability, within a market where Public Administrations and software firms play their respective roles.

    About ASC

    ASC is a collaborative development environment based on GForge, to help public administrations to collaborate, using message forums , mailing lists and tools to create and control access to Source Code Management repositories.

    Related post:

    Italian Government: funds to sustain open source innovation

    Technorati Tags: Open Source Government, Italy, CNIPA

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 5:24 pm on May 6, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Open Source Website: SWiK by SourceLabs 

    Cybernote weekend website article is dedicated to SWiK, a community-driven website created by SourceLabs aimed at allowing people to share all kind of information about open source projects.

    SwiK is a kind of Newsvine about software development and open source projects, aimed at helping people to organize the world of open source. SwiK it is an open source wiki and it uses Ajax, JavaScript and Textile, making editing easy and straightforward, try it out by yourself.

    In Ashley‘s words:

    It’s like Wikipedia, Del.icio.us, and Digg all mixed into one, but it’s just for anything related with Open Source projects. The great thing about SWiK is that it showcases all of the hard work that people have put into their Open Source projects. If you’re unfamiliar with Open Source projects and you’d like to find and discover new ones, this is the perfect place to start.

    Anyone can contribute, writing anything related to open source, in any language, where English is the default one.

    Looking for some hystorical background I found a long post by Alex Bosworth about SWiK first “birthday”, a reading that I recommend to whom interested in social software.

    Alex says also that Spikesource SourceLabs is using SWiK internally:

    I don’t think there’s any reason it can’t be used for various purposes beyond driving swik.net, and in fact for the past 6 months internally at SourceLabs we’ve repurposed SWiK-Source to run as our internal wiki to help organize our internal projects. People write weekly status reports in the blog pages, describe design policies in wiki pages, and use tags to avoid a disorganized wiki.

    I am willing to give it a try, I’ll keep you posted about it.

    Technorati Tags: Open Source, SWiK, SourceLabs, social software

     
    • Vin 5:38 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink

      Did you mean ‘SourceLabs’ when you said “Spikesource is using SWiK internally” ? Because the title and content do not match.

    • Roberto Galoppini 5:54 pm on May 7, 2007 Permalink

      Vin thank you, I promptly corrected my mistake!

  • Roberto Galoppini 7:37 pm on May 4, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Italian Open Source Evangelists: Rufo Guerreschi 

    Rufo Guerreschi is a political activist, an open source a free software evangelist and entrepreneur, who recently established am association – the Telematics Freedom Foundation – for the enforcement and extension of democratic and communication constitutional rights.

    I asked Rufo, who I personally met about four years ago when he was looking for advices on free software licenses, to join the conversation to tell us more about his new activities and licensing proposals.

    How did everything start?

    I discovered free software as I started drafting grant proposals at the World Citizen Foundation in New York in early 2001. It’s goals were to develop democratic organizing software that would enable citizen-controlled global constituent processes, eventually leading to a world democratic order. It became quickly obvious that the use of proprietary software and software patents to support such processes would have in many ways limited the democratic effectiveness of those processes. During several conferences about e-democracy in the following year, I met Richard Stallman. We met many times after that, and I believe we have built a solid discourse on political phylosophy based on shared ethical goals. More recently I have become involved with proposals, through the Telematics Freedom Foundation, on how the free software movement can concretely extend copyleft freedoms in the era of shared remote software applications.

    How did you get involved with free software from a business point of view?

    The reason that brought me to found Partecs had the objective to create a sustainable community of client political organizations which, within total freedom, would contract us to extend and modify an initial platform for their unique needs. Originally, it wanted to be a non-profit organization, but we thought it would not have appeared as a credible provider of technology to large mainstream political organizations. Also, it would have been undemocratic for such software to be sustained by donations, as donors would have had an indirect control on the features of those tools. Members of democratic political organizations should get used to paying for democratic tools, otherwise others will on their behalf, acquiring in many ways and indirect but powerful influence on those organizations (i.e. GoogleGroups).

    The “personal itch” this time was a political one, not a developer’s one like for others.

    What does it mean to you being an Italian Open Source Entrepreneur?

    Italy places huge obstacles to any innovative work in IT in general. This dramatic situation extends to so many areas for such long time, that it has generated a large amount of cynicism even in young people. Such decline is so engrained and in the interest of so many people in power positions, that I foresee that Italians will end up mostly “making cappuccinos for the Chinese people”; which is not such a bad destiny on the medium term.
    Italian and European governments should decide to actively defend both their economic interests and ethical principles by directly countering software patenting and proprietary software practices. That, I think, would be its best hope to revive a software industry, which consists of mostly of little more than foreign proprietary software reselling and low-skilled integration services. Such revival would bring with it all other market sectors, whose innovation increasingly relies on software.

    Rufo you are preparing a political agenda here, don’t you? 😉 On a more serious line I agree with you, we need governments better prepared on “technological issues” that can affect dramatically IT business.

    Tell us something about your recent initiative about Telematics

    We have a feeling we may be on to something very innovative and important. After a preliminary analysis, we may have found a way for the users of any given telematic service, built using FLOSS, to deploy an effective, verifiable and democratic control over their relevant shared hardware and software systems. Concurrently, it may also create a way in which a viable “copyleft” economic model to sustain the joint creation This may as well as creating a sustainable econo-system for the expansion of those tools.

    Thank you Rufo, and please keep us updated!

    Technorati Tags: Free Software, Telematics, Partecs, Sammondano, Guerreschi

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 8:17 am on May 1, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    Internet Governance Forum: getting prepared for the next meeting 

    The Government of Brazil will host in Rio de Janeiro on 12 – 15 November 2007 the second Internet Governance Forum meeting. The IGF website – aimed at supporting the consultative process on the convening of the IGF and provides an interactive collaborative space where all stakeholders can air their views and exchange ideas – publiced a new announcement, as follows.

    Preparing for the Second Meeting of the IGF

    A draft programme outline and meeting schedule for the Rio de Janeiro Meeting are available for comment.

    The documents aim to provide an input into the open round of consultations on 23 May 2007 to discuss programme and agenda for the second meeting of the IGF in Rio de Janeiro. The programme outline will be revised in light of comments received. Comments submitted to the IGF Secretariat ( igf@unog.ch) or posted in our online discussion section by 17 May 2007 will be reflected in a revised version. (More …)

     
  • Roberto Galoppini 11:27 am on April 26, 2007 Permalink | Reply  

    File Format War: more on China’s position on open standards 

    William New at the Intellectual Property Watch wrote an article entitled “Open Source, Standards Get a boost In China” reporting that China, among others, says that sometimes companies owning (hidden) patents when their standards get momentum they start charging high prices for licenses. The issue was discussed, as mentioned earlier, at a 17-18 April event in Beijing, below some excerpts of the original post.

    The name of the conference was said by organisers to change overnight to “WTO: IPRs Issues in Standardization,” similar to the title of a 2005 paper China submitted at the WTO to push for changes to the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.[..]

    Speaking at the event, Hu Caiyong, CEO of Beijing Redflag Chinese 2000 Software Technology, an open-source software company, said international standards have not been fair to China and should be ignored, at least for now. “There’s no level playground,” he said. Countries present in international organisations like the World Trade Organization are there “to profit their own interests.”

    “To establish an intellectual property protection system conforming to Chinese characteristics, protecting independent innovation: Avoid resorting to international usual practice blindly,” one of his slides read. He said Microsoft uses a less-precise western-based system.

    Hu’s company’s Linux-based open source software, RedOffice, has been adopted by more than 200 local governments in China. “We are now in a position to compete with Microsoft,” he said, adding that his company has received regular legal threats from foreign technology and telecommunications firms. But he said he has support from the Chinese government as open-source software is essential for China’s development of competing and independent tools. (More …)

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel