Stallman starts a campaign promoting Ogg Theora
Today reading Robin Good I happened to know that Richard Stallman asked him to remove from YouTube his video clips showing Richard’s interview, because
[..] it doesn’t work with free software!
Robin Good is an independent reporter trying to spread Stallman’s ideas:
While I am fundamentally a supporter of Richard Stallman’s views on free software and democracy, I am also an indipendent reporter trying to spread and divulge his ideas, concepts, plans which nonetheless his huge popularity are still completely unknown to the greater part of my readers.
But who knows Stallman knows how important is popularity to him:
The goal of GNU was to give users freedom, not just to be popular.
Despite Richard often forgets that GNU popularity wasn’t supposed to be a goal, he always made clear that the ultimate goal is users’ freedom.
Preventing people from knowing about him and FSF, is a means toward that goal?
The Ogg Theora “standard”. Ogg Theora is an open format supported by an application released under a BSD-style license, but so far there is no format’s specification other than the source code of the program.
No wonder the format has not been approved by any standardization body yet.
Open standards may impose “reasonable and non-discriminatory†royalty fees and/or other licensing terms on implementers of the standard and are harmful for OSS implementations.
Besides licensing issues there are other important issues within standardization bodies policies, like the ten rights reported in Krechmer’s paper “The meaning of Open Standardâ€.
Standardization bodies should be able to decline to certify subset implementations, or to place requirements upon extensions, as suggested by Perens in his Open Standards and practice, in order to avoid predatory practices.
Richard, Freedom is about knowledge, and file format specifications matters!
][ stefano maffulli » La popolarità del progetto GNU 8:58 am on February 9, 2007 Permalink
[…] Roberto giustamente nota che OGG è un formato privo di specifiche, sebbene abbia il codice sorgente di programmi rilasciati con licenze BSD come riferimento. Il mio lettore di audio supporta OGG, ma è vero che non ce ne sono molti in commercio. Sulla specifica richiesta di rimuovere i file da youtube non sono molto d’accordo con Richard: l’importante in questi casi è offrire una scelta. Però devo ammettere che con questa sua richiesta a Robin Good ha provocato un po’ di post sul tema OGG, no? Commercial Open Source Software » Stallman starts a campaign promoting Ogg Theora […]
Roberto Galoppini 11:15 am on February 9, 2007 Permalink
Stefano, President of the Italian Chapter of Free Software Foundation Europe, wrote a post (Italian) talking about the issue. While he understands the reasons behind Richard’s decision, he looks concerned about it. Others are quiet critical about it.
Simo 3:54 pm on February 9, 2007 Permalink
Richard didn’t ask him to actually _remove_ the videos.
Robin took a general statment which can be summarized in: “please don’t publish videos that can’t be viewed with free software”, and made it into a scandalistic article.
If you read the article to the end, you’ll find out that Robin was at least deceiving, as he admits that Stallman, after direct request, didn’t deny him permission to post the video on YouTube, he just stated a preference not to.
So what is it this all about? Just bashing RMS as usual … it seem a national sport nowadays.
Robin Good 6:24 pm on February 9, 2007 Permalink
Hello Simo,
I am not into bashing Stallman at all.
That’s not my goal.
As I have clearly stated in the beginning and end of my article I am actually in full support of the ideas and principles he is defending.
Re making a scandalistic article from a supposedly gentle and open-minded offer, let me just cite again for you what Stallman titled and wrote in his first email:
“Please remove the clips from YouTube!
…please remove those video clips from YouTube. Please post them in a way that works with free software, or NOT AT ALL.”
My point is that I should not be restricted to post these video clips in a largely unknown and unsupported format, which does not allow for direct streaming from within a browser. I do not write for an audience of geeks and many of my readers don’t even know who Richard Stallman is. If I make it too difficult for them to even find out what free software is really all about I don’t really see what’s the benefit I am bringing to them.
What perplexes me the most is that if these very video clips were allowed free existence and distribution across all formats and video sharing services, just like it has been happening right now, Richard’s and the FSF message would reach the eyes and ears of thousands more people.
If we expect individuals to use their head, to reason and make sense of Stallman’s logic and principles and then to take action with it, how can we pretend that these same individuals learn and discover these messages if we make it so hard for them to get at them?
So, if pretending to have the freedom to post my video interviews on the media I prefer and without restrictions of sort is considered “bashing Richard Stallman and writing scandalistic articles” I am definitely gulty of these horrible sins.
Simo 2:09 pm on February 10, 2007 Permalink
I was just criticizing the way you put it down.
While I agree myself that Free Software compatible formats should be used whenever possible, I also agree with you that spreading information, in some cases, is more important.
You, as media writer, know very well that the way you tell a story make a lot of a difference in the way the public perceives it. That’s the point, not your freedom to put a video on YouTube.
Roberto Galoppini 9:11 pm on February 12, 2007 Permalink
Simo I believe Robin told the story the way it is. I suggest you to read again the article, it has some interesting updates you might enjoy.
Robin’s article raised an important issue within FSF and it might eventually have helped a process: stay tuned!
Roberto Galoppini 10:08 am on March 1, 2007 Permalink
More interesting updates from Robin, no doubt he helped the process eventually, finding tools and services to upload and to watch video using free software. I would call it a nice gift to Richard and Free Software’s friends from Master New Media.