http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/07/02/open-core-is-not-a-business-model/ “equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism” Wed, 23 May 2012 22:07:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1 hourly 1 http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/07/02/open-core-is-not-a-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-665875 Tweets that mention Open Core is not a Business Model -- Topsy.com Sun, 04 Jul 2010 09:44:43 +0000 http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=2140#comment-665875 [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Roberto Galoppini, Dr. Roy Schestowitz. Dr. Roy Schestowitz said: #OpenCore is Like "Dual Licensing", "Not a Business Model" http://ur1.ca/0jj1q http://ur1.ca/0jj1r [...] [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Roberto Galoppini, Dr. Roy Schestowitz. Dr. Roy Schestowitz said: #OpenCore is Like "Dual Licensing", "Not a Business Model" http://ur1.ca/0jj1q http://ur1.ca/0jj1r [...]

]]> http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/07/02/open-core-is-not-a-business-model/comment-page-1/#comment-665873 Stefano Maffulli Sat, 03 Jul 2010 21:28:09 +0000 http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=2140#comment-665873 Funambol is not Open Core as many people intend it. The whole open source package is feature complete and useful in enterprise as is, while only the portal (and some API that are used by it) of Funambol Carrier Edition is not open source. Funny enough, none of the customers have bought it either (see the list http://www.funambol.com/solutions/mobilesyncservices.php). Funambol is not Open Core as many people intend it. The whole open source package is feature complete and useful in enterprise as is, while only the portal (and some API that are used by it) of Funambol Carrier Edition is not open source. Funny enough, none of the customers have bought it either (see the list http://www.funambol.com/solutions/mobilesyncservices.php).

]]>