<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EU Oracle Sun Investigation: Carlo Piana’s Feedback</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/01/26/eu-oracle-sun-investigation-carlo-piana%e2%80%99s-feedback/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/01/26/eu-oracle-sun-investigation-carlo-piana%e2%80%99s-feedback/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 21:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/01/26/eu-oracle-sun-investigation-carlo-piana%e2%80%99s-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-662802</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 07:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1841#comment-662802</guid>
		<description>Actually &lt;a href=""http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/04/what-the-sunoracle-combination.html rel="nofollow"&gt;O' Reilly Community&lt;/a&gt; along with &lt;a href="http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2009/jw-04-what-oracle-sun-means-for-java.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Java World&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/04/oracle-buys-sun-is-mysql-doome.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;InternetNews&lt;/a&gt; were the first to question, others like &lt;a href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2009/12/15/java-in-2010-bringing-in-the-receivers/" rel="nofollow"&gt;James Governor&lt;/a&gt; keep spending some words on this subject. As a matter of fact the EU didn't raise any issue about Java, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually <a href=""http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/04/what-the-sunoracle-combination.html rel="nofollow">O&#8217; Reilly Community</a> along with <a href="http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-04-2009/jw-04-what-oracle-sun-means-for-java.html" rel="nofollow">Java World</a> and <a href="http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/04/oracle-buys-sun-is-mysql-doome.html" rel="nofollow">InternetNews</a> were the first to question, others like <a href="http://www.redmonk.com/jgovernor/2009/12/15/java-in-2010-bringing-in-the-receivers/" rel="nofollow">James Governor</a> keep spending some words on this subject. As a matter of fact the EU didn&#8217;t raise any issue about Java, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: magomarcelo</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2010/01/26/eu-oracle-sun-investigation-carlo-piana%e2%80%99s-feedback/comment-page-1/#comment-662800</link>
		<dc:creator>magomarcelo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1841#comment-662800</guid>
		<description>I wonder why all the debate has been on MySQL and not even a word was spent on Java open-ness and its specs being governed by the JCP which is not really an independent foundation like Mozilla, but has Sun/Oracle in advantage on all other parties - to me that is a much more valuable common asset to protect than MySQL - let's see what will be announced...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder why all the debate has been on MySQL and not even a word was spent on Java open-ness and its specs being governed by the JCP which is not really an independent foundation like Mozilla, but has Sun/Oracle in advantage on all other parties - to me that is a much more valuable common asset to protect than MySQL - let&#8217;s see what will be announced&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

