<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Queplix didn&#8217;t go Open, but for a Reason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/02/queplix-didnt-go-open-but-for-a-reason/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/02/queplix-didnt-go-open-but-for-a-reason/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Links 08/11/2009: Good Mandriva and Ubuntu Reviews &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2009/11/02/queplix-didnt-go-open-but-for-a-reason/comment-page-1/#comment-661811</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 08/11/2009: Good Mandriva and Ubuntu Reviews &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/?p=1693#comment-661811</guid>
		<description>[...] Queplix didn’t go Open, but for a Reason Strategic decisions about what to keep secret and what to make open should come out of a deep analysis of which are your value propositions and core competencies, and changing direction is always an option. I would consider the opportunity to not remove old open source links though, maybe updating those pages and explaining the change of strategy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Queplix didn’t go Open, but for a Reason Strategic decisions about what to keep secret and what to make open should come out of a deep analysis of which are your value propositions and core competencies, and changing direction is always an option. I would consider the opportunity to not remove old open source links though, maybe updating those pages and explaining the change of strategy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

