<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source at Microsoft: an analysis of Microsoft Open Source Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fear</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-656979</link>
		<dc:creator>Fear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/#comment-656979</guid>
		<description>Yes, whatever you say. But never, ever, give full trust to this particular company. It is in their blood, it was their very foundation: dirty agreements, patents &amp; convenants, embrace / extend / extinguish, and other tactics that reveal its effects way after the damage is inevitable.

These "good" news are only scary, just wait and you will surely see that Microsoft is still the same of these 30 years.

Besides FOSS has (and will) never have any need of them to survive and evolve.

Give up on the patents claims, and i will eat my words, until then, you can talk all what you want and open as much "oss" sites as you want. They're all based on lies.

Oh wait! An open source repository?? but the idea has been implemented previously by someone else...hope that sourceforge will "not sue" them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, whatever you say. But never, ever, give full trust to this particular company. It is in their blood, it was their very foundation: dirty agreements, patents &amp; convenants, embrace / extend / extinguish, and other tactics that reveal its effects way after the damage is inevitable.</p>
<p>These &#8220;good&#8221; news are only scary, just wait and you will surely see that Microsoft is still the same of these 30 years.</p>
<p>Besides FOSS has (and will) never have any need of them to survive and evolve.</p>
<p>Give up on the patents claims, and i will eat my words, until then, you can talk all what you want and open as much &#8220;oss&#8221; sites as you want. They&#8217;re all based on lies.</p>
<p>Oh wait! An open source repository?? but the idea has been implemented previously by someone else&#8230;hope that sourceforge will &#8220;not sue&#8221; them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Fletcher</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-316646</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Fletcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 14:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/#comment-316646</guid>
		<description>Roberto,

Kudos on a detailed and insightful piece...and you're spot on about Microsoft realizing it's value as a platform. Interestingly enough, I never bought the claims that Microsoft should have been more "open source friendly" in the past. Multi-national behemoths aren't "friendly" to anything except what's profitable and until recently it was profitable to attack open source with FUD and mudslinging. Now that things have changed, we're seeing Microsoft's strategy do the same. With that being said, I think Microsoft has more to gain than it does to lose from embracing open source. In light of the fact that its Windows cash cow is facing the prospect of stiff competition on the desktop and server fronts, certified open source stacks will stem the rising tide of migration from Windows to alternatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roberto,</p>
<p>Kudos on a detailed and insightful piece&#8230;and you&#8217;re spot on about Microsoft realizing it&#8217;s value as a platform. Interestingly enough, I never bought the claims that Microsoft should have been more &#8220;open source friendly&#8221; in the past. Multi-national behemoths aren&#8217;t &#8220;friendly&#8221; to anything except what&#8217;s profitable and until recently it was profitable to attack open source with FUD and mudslinging. Now that things have changed, we&#8217;re seeing Microsoft&#8217;s strategy do the same. With that being said, I think Microsoft has more to gain than it does to lose from embracing open source. In light of the fact that its Windows cash cow is facing the prospect of stiff competition on the desktop and server fronts, certified open source stacks will stem the rising tide of migration from Windows to alternatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex - Microsmeta</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-308591</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex - Microsmeta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 13:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/03/20/open-source-at-microsoft-an-analysis-of-microsoft-open-source-strategy/#comment-308591</guid>
		<description>Very interesting post, and the included links are usefull resources, too.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting post, and the included links are usefull resources, too.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
