<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Brand: No Logo Open Source?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 08:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-198324</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/#comment-198324</guid>
		<description>I wouldn't say that Open Source has, at large, a branding problem. Few open source programs and platforms are quite in the know today. For example, talking about OpenOffice.org, I can tell you that only in September in Italy it got mentioned in more than 200 articles. Not bad, I would say.

 On the other side is true that most of OS programs are unknown, and that is why I believe there is a &lt;a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/11/01/open-source-conference-open-source-enterprise-my-speech-at-quifree/" rel="nofollow"&gt;need for open source awareness campaigns&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t say that Open Source has, at large, a branding problem. Few open source programs and platforms are quite in the know today. For example, talking about OpenOffice.org, I can tell you that only in September in Italy it got mentioned in more than 200 articles. Not bad, I would say.</p>
<p> On the other side is true that most of OS programs are unknown, and that is why I believe there is a <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/11/01/open-source-conference-open-source-enterprise-my-speech-at-quifree/" rel="nofollow">need for open source awareness campaigns</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff SoftwareClub Dodd</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/comment-page-1/#comment-196676</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff SoftwareClub Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 09:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/12/07/open-source-brand-no-logo-open-source/#comment-196676</guid>
		<description>As i see it, open source has a real branding problem. Something like OpenOffice just hasn't had the brand build up of a suite like Ms Office. So people automatically lower their expectations and their interest. Same with Gimp and a branded graphics application. Same perceptions and lowered image and expectations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As i see it, open source has a real branding problem. Something like OpenOffice just hasn&#8217;t had the brand build up of a suite like Ms Office. So people automatically lower their expectations and their interest. Same with Gimp and a branded graphics application. Same perceptions and lowered image and expectations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

