Roberto Galoppini's
Commercial Open Source Software

Where Free Software meets Business
equally critical of proprietary and open source myths,
advocating software choice beyond
marketing and romanticism

European Open Source Projects: Qualipso deliverables on business models (part II)

Filed under: Commercial OSS, Get these facts, Italians do it, Open Business Models, Social Networks — by Roberto Galoppini at 6:40 am on Monday, August 27, 2007

QualiPSo - the ever largest Open Source initiative funded by the European Commission - is making public its first results, and I just started to analyze them.

The goal of the project is “to define and implement technologies, procedures and policies to leverage the Open Source Software development current practices to sound and well recognised and established industrial operations”.

QualiPSo includes 7 research and development domains (QualiPSo Competence Centres, business models, next generation forge, trustworthy results and process, information management, interoperability, legal issues), articulated in 10 work areas.

Today I read the deliverable “State of the art concerning business models for systems comprising open source software“, apparently the most promising result within the “business models” research area.

autoreferentialityCalypso Cabaret by Sackerman519

Looking at the document as a whole, basically it is an essay of pretty known and old articles, like the Seven open source business strategies for competitive advantage, by John Koenig, and the mentioned many times “Economics of Open Source” of my buddy Carlo Daffara, plus some minor citations. Not a single new business model, they just mentioned Open Source (?) Franchising, not exploiting it any further.

I must admit I learned about Sunil Joshi citations, but I honestly expected to find something more than things grasped around the net, sometimes even without double check. For example they happened to cite the Orixo consortium, so I guess they didn’t take a chance to talk with a representative, neither to read Gianugo advising on using consortia nor looking at the Orixo’s events section. On the contrary I didn’t read a mention of ZEA or Open Source Consortium, just to name two of them. I would warmly recommend them to add these, at least.

I found it auto-referential just as the already mentioned deliverable D2.1.2 , since chapter 3 “BIG INDUSTRY OSS BUSINESS MODELS CASE STUDIES” is only about 4 QualiPSo’s members.

Last but not least, chapter 4 “SME OSS BUSINESS MODELS CASE STUDIES” results to be a list of cases collected by the official sites of those firms, mostly cut&pasting public information available, not a deep research I would say.

QualipSO seems following a Ferengi’s rule: Sell the sizzle, not the steak, I hope they will come out with something interesting soon..

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

5 Comments »

Comment by Josef Assad

August 27, 2007 @ 8:20 am

No surprises, Roberto.

At a very high level, I think the involvement of the EU in open source needs to be more enabling and less leading. I don’t think free culture is rocket science, and I agree with you that regurgitation of what is known is a waste of funds, but it is also a natural consequence.

Rather than create the environment for open source adoption, it is my opinion that EU funds would be better directed at creating the conditions through which a free culture environment will organically develop. I’ve emphasised the operative words.

I don’t think free culture lends itself very willingly to massive orchestrated initiatives, but that doesn’t mean that dep pockets can’t make significant impact.

Comment by Roberto Galoppini

August 28, 2007 @ 12:49 am

Hi Josef,

to the create the conditions you talk about, the dissemination should have a prominent role in projects like this, but as Hemingway wrote:

Before we take to sea we walk on land, Before we create we must understand.

The research phase should investigate, analyze and organize known facts in depth, if its ambition is:

to make Open source a formidable lever to strengthen Europe’s competitiveness, accelerate ICT growth, and implement the i2010 policy for growth and jobs.

What I am saying here, is that at the present stage deliverables like this can’t be an appropriate tool to help IT firms to include Open Source Software in their actual business strategy.

About deep pockets, I must tell you that as European citizen I am concerned about how public money is spent.

Pingback by » Is the EU spending big bucks for the obvious from QualiPSo? | Open Source | ZDNet.com

August 28, 2007 @ 3:22 pm

[…] Unfortunately, as Roberto Galoppini pointed out to me yesterday, the insights aren’t that deep. They don’t seem to be much more than what you would get from an hour’s worth of Googling. […]

Pingback by » Software libero e open source: lavori, concorsi e iniziative

August 31, 2007 @ 2:40 pm

[…] Stavolta non sono d’accordo con Roberto… un premio in denaro di 4500 euro per sviluppare un software libero fa gola a qualsiasi studente giovane e smart… da lì a lavorare stabilmente nel contesto di una PA il passo è breve… A proposito di soldi pubblici - e tanti questa volta - dai un’occhiata a cosa accade a livello… europeo… […]

Comment by GNUliano

August 31, 2007 @ 2:43 pm

Thank you very much Roberto for your post… I found it very useful and informative!

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

 
= "UA-946405-1"; urchinTracker();