<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/</link>
	<description>“equally critical of proprietary and open source myths, advocating software choice beyond marketing and romanticism”</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Roberto Galoppini</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/comment-page-1/#comment-484288</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Galoppini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 15:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/#comment-484288</guid>
		<description>Not many really. &lt;a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/07/04/open-source-development-about-community-and-sponsored-projects/" rel="nofollow"&gt;community open source projects&lt;/a&gt; tend to stay that way for life, even if they become hybrid projects. &lt;a href="http://acquia.com/about-us" rel="nofollow"&gt;Acquia&lt;/a&gt;, providing value-added services for &lt;a href="http://drupal.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Drupal&lt;/a&gt; is an example of what happens "usually". Instead "buying" a community project is not an easy goal, since copyright assignments should be signed by each author. And, even if feasible, "buying" a community is risky bet, definitely a decision to be handled with care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not many really. <a href="http://robertogaloppini.net/2008/07/04/open-source-development-about-community-and-sponsored-projects/" rel="nofollow">community open source projects</a> tend to stay that way for life, even if they become hybrid projects. <a href="http://acquia.com/about-us" rel="nofollow">Acquia</a>, providing value-added services for <a href="http://drupal.org/" rel="nofollow">Drupal</a> is an example of what happens &#8220;usually&#8221;. Instead &#8220;buying&#8221; a community project is not an easy goal, since copyright assignments should be signed by each author. And, even if feasible, &#8220;buying&#8221; a community is risky bet, definitely a decision to be handled with care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/comment-page-1/#comment-480639</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 10:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/#comment-480639</guid>
		<description>Interesting! I have been using Win Clam for sometime and just happened to find this piece of news by chance.

Which are other open source projects sold out in this manner?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! I have been using Win Clam for sometime and just happened to find this piece of news by chance.</p>
<p>Which are other open source projects sold out in this manner?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/comment-page-1/#comment-445644</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 15:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/#comment-445644</guid>
		<description>Hi Roberto,

Interesting trend: Another open source security project sold.

OSSEC HIDS project acquired:
http://www.ossec.net/main/ossec-project-acquired

What do you think?

-m</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Roberto,</p>
<p>Interesting trend: Another open source security project sold.</p>
<p>OSSEC HIDS project acquired:<br />
<a href="http://www.ossec.net/main/ossec-project-acquired" rel="nofollow">http://www.ossec.net/main/ossec-project-acquired</a></p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
<p>-m</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sourcefire aquires ClamAV : An Information Technology Perspective</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/comment-page-1/#comment-103706</link>
		<dc:creator>Sourcefire aquires ClamAV : An Information Technology Perspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/#comment-103706</guid>
		<description>[...] Having been a longtime supporter of the ClamAV project, I was interested to see the headline, Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire. ClamWin is actually the product that I&#8217;ve used extensively in the past. Our new self-service kiosk project at work is running this and doing beautifully through the test period. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Having been a longtime supporter of the ClamAV project, I was interested to see the headline, Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire. ClamWin is actually the product that I&#8217;ve used extensively in the past. Our new self-service kiosk project at work is running this and doing beautifully through the test period. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: University Update - Linux - Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire</title>
		<link>http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/comment-page-1/#comment-81716</link>
		<dc:creator>University Update - Linux - Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 17:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robertogaloppini.net/2007/08/20/open-source-antivirus-clamav-project-sold-to-sourcefire/#comment-81716</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube                           Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at Commercial Open Source Software on Monday, August 20, 2007     The ClamAV project - the known open source anti-virus toolkit - last friday announced that all project’s Intellectual assets had been sold from the ... from StillSecure, or worse Tenable Security, Sourcefire seems willing to balance open source and business ... (mainly virus signatures) from now on? Dana asks if open source users, are going to get caught   Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Commercial Open Source Software &#187;                     10 Most Recent News Articles About Linux [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube                           Open Source Antivirus: ClamAV project sold to Sourcefire &#187;  This Summary is from an article posted at Commercial Open Source Software on Monday, August 20, 2007     The ClamAV project - the known open source anti-virus toolkit - last friday announced that all project’s Intellectual assets had been sold from the &#8230; from StillSecure, or worse Tenable Security, Sourcefire seems willing to balance open source and business &#8230; (mainly virus signatures) from now on? Dana asks if open source users, are going to get caught   Summary Provided by Technorati.comView Original Article at Commercial Open Source Software &#187;                     10 Most Recent News Articles About Linux [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
