Open Source firm, what do you mean?

Matt Asay, who recently announced that if you want to follow his valuable open source commentary you have to to do it from InfoWorld, yesterday wrote about what constitutes an open source company.

Some models rely on a small percentage of the being open source, others fund open source projects but have the majority of their software products proprietary and I believe he is right stating:

In someone’s mind, every open source company out there is not open source enough.

Matt concludes saying that the best policing mechanism he found to answer the question is the community. So, what do you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

2 Responses to “Open Source firm, what do you mean?”


  1. 1 Savio Rodrigues

    Hey Roberto,

    Yes, let the community do the policing. So, it’s funny to see Matt get upset about the community discussion on TSS about MPL+Attribution licenses.

    Check out this link for a counter point of view to Matt & Dave.

    I can see both sides….need to think about this one some more.

  2. 2 Roberto Galoppini

    Let’s see what’s going on with the SocialText proposal for Attribution provision, I believe OSI has a good chance to show the world why we need them.

Leave a Reply


About the Editor

Roberto Galoppini on Open Source Software
Roberto has over 20 years experience in the computer industry, and has spent the last 10 years working in the intersection of open source software and business development. Roberto has taken an active interest in different open source projects and organizations, he also served on some advisory boards, and helped large IT vendors, open source vendors and customers to design and deploy their open source strategies. He works at SourceForge, and opinions expressed here don't necessarily represent employer's positions, strategies, or opinion.