Open Source firm, what do you mean?

Matt Asay, who recently announced that if you want to follow his valuable open source commentary you have to to do it from InfoWorld, yesterday wrote about what constitutes an open source company.

Some models rely on a small percentage of the being open source, others fund open source projects but have the majority of their software products proprietary and I believe he is right stating:

In someone’s mind, every open source company out there is not open source enough.

Matt concludes saying that the best policing mechanism he found to answer the question is the community. So, what do you think?

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

2 Responses to “Open Source firm, what do you mean?”


  1. 1 Savio Rodrigues

    Hey Roberto,

    Yes, let the community do the policing. So, it’s funny to see Matt get upset about the community discussion on TSS about MPL+Attribution licenses.

    Check out this link for a counter point of view to Matt & Dave.

    I can see both sides….need to think about this one some more.

  2. 2 Roberto Galoppini

    Let’s see what’s going on with the SocialText proposal for Attribution provision, I believe OSI has a good chance to show the world why we need them.

Leave a Reply


About Roberto

Roberto Galoppini on Open Source Software
I am a specialist in Commercial Open Source Software, consulting on marketing and business strategy. I help organizations to build new business strategies for the open source economy. I speak widely on open source and open standards throughout the world.